MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410195302 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf749

The unabridged satellite luminosity function of Milky Way-like galaxies in ΛCDM: the contribution of ‘orphan’ satellites

2025· article· en· W4410195302 on OpenAlexaff
Isabel Santos-Santos, Carlos S. Frenk, Julio F. Navarro, Shaun Cole, John Helly

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilH2020 European Research CouncilLeibniz-GemeinschaftRijksuniversiteit GroningenDurham UniversityDepartment for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK Government
KeywordsPhysicsMilky WaySatellite galaxyLuminosity functionGalaxyAstronomyAstrophysicsSatelliteLuminosityGalaxy formation and evolution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We study the abundance, radial distribution, and orbits of luminous satellites in simulations of Milky Way-mass dark haloes in the $\Lambda$cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmology. We follow the evolution of a halo from the Aquarius project and the formation of its ‘maximal’ satellite population with the GALFORM semi-analytic model of galaxy formation. This population consists of all subhaloes able to form stars through efficient gas cooling before or after reionization, which effectively selects systems with peak circular velocities exceeding a critical threshold of roughly $\sim 15$–20 km s−1. The total number of luminous satellites is sensitive to the assumed redshift of reionization, but the shape of the GALFORM satellite stellar mass function is robust, peaking at the stellar mass (∼103$\mathrm{ M}_\odot$) of a halo just above the critical threshold. Subhaloes are prone to artificial disruption in the tidal field of the main halo, with the number of surviving satellites increasing with resolution. Even in the highest resolution simulation (Aq-L1, with particle mass $m_{\rm p}\sim 10^3\, \mathrm{ M}_\odot$), a substantial number of satellite subhaloes are disrupted, leaving behind ‘orphan’ galaxies tracked in GALFORM by the subhalo’s most-bound particle before disruption. When orphans are included (and the effects of tidal stripping on stars are neglected), all simulations that adequately resolve the critical threshold yield a converged maximal satellite stellar mass function. Most orphans were accreted early, are found in the central regions of the main halo, and make up roughly half of all satellites in Aq-L1. Taking orphans into account there is no need to populate subhaloes below the critical threshold with satellites to fit the radial distribution of Milky Way satellites, as has been argued in recent work. Our model predicts that orphans dominate the ultrafaint population and that many more satellites with small apocentric radii should be detected in upcoming deep wide-field surveys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207