MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410202422 · doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2025.02.015

Sex Differences in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy and Treatment Response to AT-001

2025· article· en· W4410202422 on OpenAlexaff
Vanessa Blumer, James L. Januzzi, Yuxi Liu, Javed Butler, Justin A. Ezekowitz, Riccardo Perfetti, Julio Rosenstock, Stefano Del Prato, W.H. Wilson Tang, Alessia Urbinati, Faı̈ez Zannad, Gregory D. Lewis, Scott D. Solomon, Sheila Hedge, Nasrien E. Ibrahim, Carolyn S.P. Lam

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC Heart Failure · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAldose Reductase and Taurine
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetic cardiomyopathyInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusHeart failureCardiomyopathyCardiologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DbCM) is a significant cause of heart failure (HF) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Although sex differences are noted in HF patients, it is unclear if such differences exist in those with DbCM and whether sex-based differences affect treatment responses. OBJECTIVES: This analysis focuses on sex differences in baseline characteristics of study participants with DbCM at high risk for progression to overt HF and sex-based treatment responses to high-dose AT-001, a novel aldose reductase inhibitor. METHODS: The ARISE-HF trial was a Phase 3, randomized, international, placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AT-001 in study participants with DbCM. RESULTS: Of 691 participants, 348 (50.4%) were women. At baseline, women had higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations (92 vs 60 ng/L; P < 0.001), lower peak oxygen uptake (13.87 vs 17.59 mL/kg/min; P < 0.001), shorter cardiopulmonary exercise testing durations (8.47 vs 11.05 minutes; P < 0.001), and worse quality of life and health status (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score 87.79 vs 92.55; P < 0.001; Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly score 137.87 vs 171.09; P < 0.001) compared with men. Despite these differences, there were no significant sex differences in the efficacy or tolerability of high-dose AT-001 compared with placebo. The placebo-corrected oxygen uptake change was 0.26 for women and 0.27 for men (P = 0.58), and changes from baseline to month 15 in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly scores showed no significant sex differences (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite baseline differences between women and men with DbCM, the efficacy and safety of high-dose AT-001 are comparable across sexes. These findings highlight the presence of sex-specific characteristics in DbCM and underscore the importance of further research to understand potential sex-specific mechanisms. (Aldose Reductase Inhibition for Stabilization of Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure Trial [ARISE-HF]; NCT04083339).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJACC Heart FailureSame topicAldose Reductase and TaurineFrench-language works237,207