Template-assisted sequence knockin rescues skeletal and cardiac muscle function in a deletion model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) poses challenges in therapy design due to dystrophin's complex role in maintaining muscle function since the restoration of truncated protein products has failed to completely address the disease's pathophysiology in clinical trials. As ∼70% of patients harbor deletions, strategies enabling targeted DNA insertion to restore full-length dystrophin protein are essential. Here, we present template-assisted sequence knockin (TASK), a strategy that we employed to specifically correct the Dmd Δ52-54 mutation in a murine model. By co-delivering a repair template and the Cas9 nuclease using AAV9s, the splice-competent sequence for Dmd exons 52-54 was integrated into the residual intron 54 locus, resulting in the systemic restoration of full-length dystrophin at therapeutically relevant levels in the heart and across all skeletal muscles, leading to significant functional improvements. TASK demonstrates the highest efficiency of exogenous DNA knockin reported to date, achieving rescue of key dystrophic hallmarks in a deletion model of DMD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".