MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410208965 · doi:10.1101/2025.05.08.652809

Interplay between MIG-6/papilin and TGF-β signaling promotes extracellular matrix remodeling and modulates the maintenance of neuronal architecture

2025· preprint· en· W4410208965 on OpenAlexafffund
Malika Nadour, Robert I. Valette R. L., Noémie Frébault, Valérie Fontaine, Lise Rivollet, Claire Y. Bénard

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNational Institutes of HealthUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsExtracellular matrixArchitectureCell biologyTransforming growth factorNeuroscienceBiologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Neuronal architecture laid out during embryogenesis persists lifelong, ensuring normal nervous system function. However, the mechanisms underlying the long-term maintenance of neuronal organization remain largely unknown. We previously uncovered that the conserved extracellular matrix protein MIG-6/papilin impacts collagen IV remodeling and neuronal maintenance, such that disruption of MIG-6/papilin leads to a collagen IV fibrotic state and altered tissue biomechanics, thereby stabilizing neuronal architecture. Here, we combine incisive molecular genetics and in vivo quantitative imaging to determine how this mig-6 -dependent fibrotic phenotype is modulated, by investigating the implication of the TGF-β pathway, which is well known to regulate fibrosis in mammals. Our findings highlight a mechanism whereby the interplay between MIG-6/papilin and the TGF-β pathway regulates ECM composition and neuronal maintenance, with MIG-6/papilin acting as a positive regulator of TGF-β signaling. This work provides key insights into the molecular basis of sustaining neuronal architecture and offers a foundation for understanding age-related neurodegenerative and fibrotic conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207