Karatsuba Algorithm Revisited for 2D Convolution Computation Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Convolution plays a significant role in many scientific and technological computations, such as artificial intelligence and signal processing. Convolutional computations consist of many dot-product operations (multiplication-accumulation, or MAC), for which the Winograd algorithm is currently the most widely used method to reduce the number of MACs. The Karatsuba algorithm, since its introduction in the 1960s, has been traditionally used as a fast arithmetic method to perform multiplication between large-bit-width operands. It had not been exploited to accelerate 2D convolution computations before. In this paper, we revisited the Karatsuba algorithm and exploited it to reduce the number of MACs in 2D convolutions. The matrices are first segmented into tiles in a divide-and-conquer method, and the resulting submatrices are overlapped to construct the final output matrix. Our analysis and benchmarks have shown that for convolution operations of the same dimensions, the Karatsuba algorithm requires the same number of multiplications but fewer additions as compared with the Winograd algorithm. A pseudocode implementation is also provided to demonstrate the complexity reduction in Karatsuba-based convolution. FPGA implementation of Karatsuba-based convolution also achieves 33.6% LUTs (Look -up Tables) reduction compared with Winograd-based implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".