Corrigendum: A proteome-level investigation into Plasmodiophora brassicae resistance in Brassica napus canola
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FIGURE 1 | Clubroot gall development following inoculation with P. brassicae pathotype 3. Control at 7-, 14-, and 21-DPI, Clubroot resistant (CR) inoculated line at 7-, 14-, and 21-DPI Clubroot susceptible (CS) inoculated 7-, 14-, and 21-DPI.Histology images of root cross sections after P. brassicae infection at 7-, 14-, and 21-days post inoculation (DPI). Root tissues were stained with eosin and hematoxylin. Each column indicates DPI of the pathogen and the rows show the control and inoculated genotypes [clubroot-susceptible (CS) and resistant (CR) lines]. At 7 DPI, infected cells showed primary plasmodia with dark purple mass within cells indicated by the solid yellow arrow. At 14 DPI, CS inoculated line showed the presence of secondary plasmodia; however, the pathogen development on the CR inoculated line was not progressed to secondary plasmodia phase. At 21 DPI, pathogen clearly progressed to secondary plasmodia phase, maturing into developing resting spores in the CS line. However, the infection development was not progressed further at the same time point on the CR line.FIGURE 3 | Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of root cross sections after P. brassicae infection at 7-, 14-, and 21-DPI. Each column indicates days after inoculation of the pathogen and the rows show the control and inoculated genotypes (CR and CS). At 7 DPI, infected cells showed primary plasmodia within cells indicated by the solid yellow arrow. At 14 DPI, CS inoculated line showed the presence of secondary plasmodia; however, the pathogen development on the CR inoculated line was not progressed to secondary plasmodia phase. At 21 DPI, pathogen clearly progressed to secondary plasmodia phase, maturing into resting spores. However, the infection development was not progressed in the CR line at the timepoint.PAGE \* Arabic \* MERGEFORMAT 3We apologize for this error and state that this correction does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.Reminder: Figures, tables, and images will be published under a Creative Commons CC-BY licence and permission must be obtained for use of copyrighted material from other sources (including re-published/adapted/modified/partial figures and images from the internet). It is the responsibility of the authors to acquire the licenses, to follow any citation instructions requested by third-party rights holders, and cover any supplementary charges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".