MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410216400 · doi:10.26905/abdimas.v10i1.14967

Optimization of differentiated learning through training on innovative learning activities using Loose Parts

2025· article· en· W4410216400 on OpenAlexaff
Yuniarta Syarifatul Umami, Aisyah Nur Atika

Bibliographic record

VenueAbdimas Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInnovative Educational Technologies
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
FundersUniversitas Jember
KeywordsTraining (meteorology)Computer scienceKnowledge managementBusinessGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The new paradigm of the Merdeka Curriculum emphasizes the implementation of differentiated learning, aiming to provide enjoyable learning experiences tailored to students' knowledge levels and learning needs. This Community Service Program is designed to train early childhood education (PAUD) teachers to adapt and innovate in Differentiated Learning using Loose Parts. The program targets PAUD teachers at the Cluster Activity Center (PKG) in Jelbuk District, Jember Regency. The participating community comprises 17 PAUD institutions, with a total of 30 PAUD teachers involved. The program is conducted in three stages: socialization, training, and best practice mentoring. Methods employed include lectures, quizzes, and project-based activities. Based on participant satisfaction questionnaires, the results of this community service initiative reveal high satisfaction scores: 96.67 percent in the attitude aspect, 90 percent in the knowledge aspect, and 90 percent in the skills aspect. Furthermore, through best practice activities, teachers achieved optimal knowledge and skill transfer. This will enable them to innovate Differentiated Learning activities using Loose Parts, which can be implemented in the learning activities of their respective PAUD institutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbdimas Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka MalangSame topicInnovative Educational TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207