Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome Presenting with Multifocal Infarcts: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a rare and underdiagnosed cause of multifocal infarcts, characterized by transient segmental narrowing of cerebral arteries. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges, as well as the therapeutic response to nimodipine and intra-arterial therapy. Main Symptoms and Clinical Findings: A 54-year-old female presented with a month-long history of confusion, headaches, and weakness. MRI findings revealed multifocal infarcts across multiple vascular territories. Main Diagnoses, Therapeutic Interventions, and Outcomes: RCVS was diagnosed following a diagnostic cerebral angiography, which demonstrated the reversibility of vasospasm with intra-arterial milrinone and verapamil. Treatment with nimodipine resulted in symptom stabilization, and rehabilitation services were initiated. Conclusion: This case underscores the need to consider RCVS early in the diagnostic process for multifocal infarcts. Rapid identification through angiography and prompt initiation of nimodipine therapy can prevent unnecessary interventions and support meaningful neurological recovery. Key Points 1. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome can mimic more common pathologies like central nervous system vasculitis or infection, and is often underrecognized. 2. Accurate diagnosis of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome relies on imaging techniques such as cerebral angiography, which can demonstrate reversible vasospasm, a key diagnostic hallmark. 3. Prompt treatment with calcium channel blockers, such as nimodipine, is essential to both prevent further neurological damage and improve outcomes. Early diagnosis reduces the risk of overtreatment with immunosuppressants and improves functional outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".