Identification of targetable vulnerabilities of PLK1-overexpressing cancers by synthetic dosage lethality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chromosomal instability (CIN) drives tumor heterogeneity, complicating cancer therapy. Although Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) overexpression induces CIN, direct inhibition of PLK1 has shown limited clinical benefits. We therefore performed a genome-wide synthetic dosage lethality (SDL) screen to identify effective alternative targets and validated over 100 candidates using in vivo and in vitro secondary CRISPR screens. We employed direct-capture Perturb-seq to assess the transcriptional consequences and viability of each SDL perturbation at a single-cell resolution. This revealed IGF2BP2 as a critical genetic dependency that, when targeted, downregulated PLK1 and significantly restricted tumor growth. Mechanistic analyses showed that IGF2BP2 loss disrupted cellular energy metabolism and mitochondrial ATP production by downregulating PLK1 levels as well as genes associated with oxidative phosphorylation. Consistent with this, pharmacological inhibition of IGF2BP2 severely impacts the viability of PLK1-overexpressing cancer cells addicted to higher metabolic rates. Our work offers a novel therapeutic strategy against PLK1-driven heterogeneous malignancies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".