MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410218557 · doi:10.2196/66722

Risk Factors for Serious Bacterial Infections Among Young Infants With Hypothermia: Protocol for a Multicenter, Retrospective Case-Control Study

2025· article· en· W4410218557 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sriram Ramgopal, Paul L. Aronson, Douglas Lorenz, Alexander J. Rogers, Andrea T. Cruz

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermal Regulation in Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintMedicineRetrospective cohort studyProtocol (science)PediatricsMulticenter studyHypothermiaIntensive care medicineInternal medicineAlternative medicineRandomized controlled trialComputer sciencePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hypothermia in young infants presenting to the emergency department (ED) may indicate a serious bacterial infection (SBI) such as a urinary tract infection, bacteremia, or bacterial meningitis. Improved understanding of the epidemiology of SBI in infants with hypothermia and the development of prediction models can help avoid unnecessary invasive procedures and antimicrobial exposure. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to (1) describe the epidemiology of SBI and herpes simplex virus (HSV) among infants with hypothermia, (2) assess the role of biomarkers in predicting SBI, and (3) derive and internally validate a multivariable predictive model for SBI among infants with hypothermia. METHODS: The study is being conducted through the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee as a retrospective nested case-control study. We will include infants with hypothermia (rectal temperature<36.5 °C) presenting to 1 of 28 pediatric EDs in the United States between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022. Exclusion criteria will include (1) fever in the ED or prior to ED arrival, (2) transfer from another health care facility, (3) technology dependence, (4) trauma, (5) skin and soft tissue infections, and (6) presentation in cardiac arrest. The primary outcomes will be culture-confirmed SBI (objectives 1-3) and HSV-positivity (objective 1). The analytic approach for each objective will be (1) to use descriptive statistics to summarize the epidemiology of SBI and HSV and clinical outcomes, (2) to compare biomarker parameters of infants with and without SBI and determine optimal cutoff values using a receiver operator characteristic curve, and (3) to develop a multivariable predictive model using penalized mixed effects logistic regression within a 1:3 case-control sample among infants in the cohort who had a blood culture obtained. RESULTS: Data collection for this study is ongoing, with a collection of data from 21 hospitals at the time of protocol submission. Of 16 sites evaluated in preliminary analysis (n=45,673), the median age is 25 (IQR 6-52) days, and 24,182 (52.9%) are male. In total, 340 (0.7%) infants have an SBI, of whom 103 had bacteremia or meningitis. Mortality occurred in 7 (2.1%; 95% CI 0.9%-4.3%). CONCLUSIONS: We will use a consensus-based outcome measure for SBI with an established data acquisition pathway. We will use a multicenter sample from US children's hospitals, using a consensus-based outcome measure for SBI and a case-control approach to evaluate outcomes to improve the management of young infants with hypothermia in the ED. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/66722.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.503
Teacher spread0.419 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research ProtocolsSame topicThermal Regulation in MedicineFrench-language works237,207