MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410222543 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103241

Final analysis of the ZOE-LTFU trial to 11 years post-vaccination: efficacy of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine against herpes zoster and related complications

2025· article· en· W4410222543 on OpenAlexaff
Ana Strezova, Javier Díez‐Domingo, Anthony L. Cunningham, Takashi Eto, Charles P. Andrews, Eun Ju Choo, David S.C. Hui, Giancarlo Icardi, Shelly McNeil, Airi Põder, Pavel Kosina, Lars Rombo, Tino F. Schwarz, Juan Carlos Tinoco, Chong‐Jen Yu, Jing Wang, Jyoti Soni, Rafael León, Agnes Mwakingwe-Omari

Bibliographic record

VenueEClinicalMedicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie University
FundersCilagSanofi PasteurModernaNovavaxBiogenBavarian NordicSanofiGlaxoSmithKline BiologicalsSeqirusAstraZenecaPfizer
KeywordsMedicineVaccinationVirologyFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Herpes zoster (HZ) vaccines should provide durable protection against HZ and HZ-related complications. We report the final analysis of a long-term follow-up (LTFU) study (ZOE-LTFU) including 11 years of follow-up after primary vaccination with recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV). Methods: ZOE-LTFU (NCT02723773) was an open-label, phase 3b study following participants of two phase 3 trials, ZOE-50 and ZOE-70. ZOE-LTFU started approximately 5 years post-vaccination in ZOE-50/70 and participants were followed for 6 years. The primary objective was to assess vaccine efficacy (VE) against HZ during ZOE-LTFU. Secondary objectives included VE against HZ from 1 month post-dose 2 in ZOE-50/70 until end of ZOE-LTFU, VE against post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) and non-PHN complications, immunogenicity, and long-term safety. The VE calculation used a historical control constructed with ZOE-50/70 placebo data. Findings: VE was assessed in the modified total vaccinated cohort (n = 7273 [mean age 67·3 years at first vaccination]). During ZOE-LTFU, VE was 79·8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73·7, 84·6) and 73·2% (95% CI: 62·9, 80·9) against HZ in participants ≥50 and ≥70 years at first vaccination, respectively, and was 87·5% (95% CI: 64·8, 96·8) against PHN and 91·7% (95% CI: 43·7, 99·8) against other HZ-related complications in participants ≥50 years. From 1 month post-dose 2 in ZOE-50/70 to the end of ZOE-LTFU, VE against HZ was 87·7% (95% CI: 84·9, 90·1) in participants ≥50 years and sustained at 82·0% (95% CI: 63·0, 92·2) in the eleventh year post-vaccination. Humoural and cell-mediated immune responses plateaued at over 5-fold and ∼7-fold, respectively, above pre-vaccination levels in ZOE-50/70. No RZV-related serious adverse events occurred. Interpretation: Efficacy of RZV against HZ and associated complications remained high through 11 years post-vaccination, indicating sustained clinical benefit. Funding: The funder of the study was GSK who was involved in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing of the report, and the decision to submit for publication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEClinicalMedicineSame topicHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207