Social dominance in rats is a determinant of susceptibility to stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Establishing a dominance hierarchy in social organisms is important for access to resources. Stress has been proposed as a major factor influencing an animal's likely position in a social hierarchy. Although individual differences in vulnerability to stress are increasingly recognized, how social hierarchy affects vulnerability remains relatively understudied. Here, we examined how the social dominance status of adult male Sprague-Dawley rats influences their response to stress in interactions with a familiar animal living in the same cage, and separately when confronting an unfamiliar rat of uncertain dominance status from another cage, using the tube test. Having determined the relatively stable within-cage social dominance status of animals, half were subjected to a single episode of 2-h immobilization stress. Cagemates, both control and stressed rats, again faced one another 1 d and 10 d after stress. First, the predetermined hierarchical rank among familiar cagemates was relatively unaffected by stress. However, second, the same stress had a differential impact in competitions between unfamiliar rats. Socially dominant control rats continued to win competitions but subordinate control rats, that had previously lost, sometimes started to win against previously dominant rats that had been stressed. Strikingly, subordinate stressed rats displayed consistent submissive-like behavior and they alone showed differential effects on dendritic spine density in the amygdala. Thus, an individual's social rank can influence its response to stress, an effect that is detectable in interactions with unfamiliar animals. These findings provide an additional dimension to animal models of stress used for exploring facets of social anxiety and withdrawal in stress-related psychiatric disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".