Pengaruh hope dan social comparison terhadap quarter-life crisis pada dewasa awal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter-life crisis is an individual's response to facing the adult phase which can be in the form of confusion, fear, despair or other psychological problems. This response is influenced by changes and transitions from adolescence to early adulthood which are filled with new demands for individuals both in family life, career, social relations, friendships, social media, and academics. This study aims to see the influence of hope and social comparison on quarter-life crisis in early adulthood. This research design uses a quantitative design with a correlational study. The data collection technique uses an online questionnaire distributed on social media Instagram, Whatsapp, and X. The subjects who participated in this study were 210 people consisting of 147 women and 63 men with the Accidental Sampling technique. The data analysis technique uses multiple linear regression analysis techniques. The results of the study showed that there was a negative influence of the Hope variable on quarter-life crisis with an effective contribution of 60.20%. Meanwhile, the social comparison variable has a positive influence with an effective contribution of 8.06%. The importance of maintaining individual hope levels and controlling social comparison through hope-based interventions can be developed as preventive measures and curative treatment can be carried out as prevention and solutions to the loss of time, energy, finances and psychological burdens for affected individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".