MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410247814 · doi:10.3389/fnins.2025.1569601

Group singing and its effect on cortisol, alpha amylase, oxytocin, and pain threshold in patients with Parkinson's disease

2025· article· en· W4410247814 on OpenAlexafffund
Adiel Mallik, Tara Raessi, Arla Good, Alex Pachete, Frank Russo

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMusic Therapy and Health
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsSalivaNeurochemicalMedicineSingingOxytocinThreshold of painParkinson's diseasePsychologyInternal medicineAudiologyPhysical therapyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that causes motor deficits, including rigidity and tremors. Pain is also a common problem for people with PD that may arise from their dopamine deficit. Some patients with PD experience temporary relief from pain through group singing, which has also been shown to mitigate vocal challenges related to PD. However, no work has been conducted to elucidate the neurochemical mechanisms of action on the pain threshold. Here, we examined whether the effects of group singing on cortisol, alpha amylase, and oxytocin levels are associated with changes in pain thresholds in patients with PD. Methods Participants with PD ( n = 14) participated in a 12-week singing program involving weekly 45-min group singing sessions in the early afternoon. Data collection, involving saliva samples and pain thresholds, was performed pre- and post-session in the 2 nd (Session 1), 7 th (Session 2), and 12 th (Session 3) weeks of the program. Saliva samples were collected before and after each session by using the passive drool method. The pain threshold was assessed before and after each session by applying pressure to the finger using a dolorimeter. Saliva samples were used to assess salivary cortisol (sCORT), alpha amylase (sAA), and oxytocin (sOXT). Pain threshold, sCORT, sAA, and sOXT change scores were calculated for each session by subtracting the pre-session value from the post-session value. Results Three mixed linear model analyses were performed to assess whether sCORT, sAA, and sOXT were associated with increased pain threshold. We found that group singing led to a significant reduction in sCORT and sAA. We also found that reductions in sCORT were significantly related to an increase in the pain threshold ( p < 0.05). However, we did not observe any relationship between pain threshold increases and sAA or between pain threshold and sOXT. Conclusion Group singing significantly increases the pain threshold in patients with PD, and this increase may be mediated through a reduction in cortisol levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeuroscienceSame topicMusic Therapy and HealthFrench-language works237,207