The Use of the Sort Card Method as an Effort to Improve the Ability to Memorize Dhikr Readings After Prayer in Aswaja Lessons at MI Pembangunan Lamongan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to determine the improvement of Aswaja learning outcomes in dhikr material through the application of the Sort Card method to fourth grade students of MI Pembangunan Lamongan. This study is a classroom action research that uses four steps, namely planning, action, observation and reflection. The subjects of this study were fourth grade students of MI Pembangunan Sidomukti Lamongan. The data for this study were obtained using test and observation techniques. Tests are used to measure learning outcomes and observations are used to analyze teacher and student learning activities. The learning model used in this study is the Sort Card method. The Sort Card learning method is one of the learning models that can motivate students to be enthusiastic about learning. Because students will be motivated to get the highest score and shout the most cheers. This learning model is very interesting and fun for every student to apply to all subjects. The results of the study show that the application of the Sort Card method can improve learning outcomes in dhikr material for fourth grade students of MI Pembangunan Sidomukti Lamongan. Student activity by applying the Sort Card method increased from 75% in cycle I to 98% at the end of cycle II. Similarly, what happened in the teacher's observation also increased from cycle I by 79% to 100% in cycle II. The results of students' classical cognitive completion in cycle I were 15 students or 84%. However, after the researcher conducted further research in cycle II with various findings in cycle I, students' classical learning completion became very high. Of the 23 students, 21 students completed or 100% and 2 students were absent due to illness. Thus, it can be concluded that the application of the Sort Card learning method can improve students' ability to memorize dhikr material.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".