MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410258208 · doi:10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100749

Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in the marine sediments associated with the petroleum hydrocarbon industry in the central Arabian Gulf

2025· article· en· W4410258208 on OpenAlex
Elnaiem Ali Elobaid, Oğuz Yiğiterhan, Ebrahim M.A.S. Al-Ansari, Zhi Chen, Yasir Elginaid Mohieldeen, Rifaat Abdalla

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hazardous Materials Advances · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersQatar UniversityQatar FoundationQatar Research, Development and Innovation Council
KeywordsPetroleumHeavy metalsHydrocarbonEnvironmental sciencePetroleum industryGulf warOceanographyGeologyEcologyEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental engineeringChemistryBiologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heavy metal contamination of marine sediments poses a critical environmental threat in the Arabian Gulf, with documented impacts linked to regional activities of petroleum industry. Despite this, there is still very limited information and a big gap in the literature on contamination status of surface sediments. Therefore, this study aims to address this concern by examining the spatial distribution and levels of heavy metals and metalloids within the sediments of the Qatar’s Exclusive Economic Zone, focusing on the potential ecological risks and toxicological impacts, associated with the petroleum hydrocarbon industry. Sediment samples were collected from the central Arabian Gulf, repressing distinctive water depths at 12 stations, spanning depths of 11 to 72 meters. The multipurpose Qatar University research vessel (R/V Janan) was utilized for sampling. Samples were analyzed for metal concentrations, grain size, and total organic carbon content. Mean concentrations (mg kg⁻¹) were found in the following order: Ca (292,281) > Al (6,530) > Fe (4,623) > Sr (2,433) > Mn (83.3) > Ni (15.5) > Cr (22) > Zn (13.1) > V (8.7) > Cu (5.7) > As (4.02) > Co (2.17) > Pb (1.43) > Cd (0.04) > Hg (0.02), with Sb levels below detectable limits of the instrument (0.0013 mg kg -1 ). The results indicated that the four major metals (Al, Fe, Sr, and Mn) exhibited higher mean concentrations than the other elements. Ni, V, Pb, Cd, Hg and Sb had the lowest concentration. Ecological risk assessments revealed that, except for As, most metals presented limited pollution risk. This elevated Arsenic concentration was observed at deep-water stations and harbor areas along the southern transect. The relationships between elemental concentrations, sediment characteristics, and their TOC contents are both evident and well-defined. Grain size fractions of sediments and TOC content contributed to low metal concentrations together with the mechanism of prevailing hydrodynamic conditions. The strong statistical correlation between the natural background elements Al, Fe, and other heavy metals indicated natural origin. The study’s multiple-element risk index highlighted that anthropogenic activities associated with oil operations, and petroleum hydrocarbon extraction facilities have a minimal impact on marine sediment heavy metal concentrations. Overall, the results suggest a low-to-slight toxic pollution status in the study area. This study provides critical information for policymakers supporting efforts for sustainable marine management strategies in the Arabian Gulf’s vulnerable ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it