MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410264842 · doi:10.1101/2025.05.05.652208

Prioritization of Deleterious Mutations Improves Genomic Prediction and Increases the Rate of Genetic Gain in Common Bean ( <i>Phaseolus vulgaris L.</i> ), a Simulation Study

2025· preprint· en· W4410264842 on OpenAlexaff
Henry A. Cordoba-Novoa, Valerio Hoyos‐Villegas

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhaseolusPrioritizationBiologyMutationGeneticsBiotechnologyHorticultureGeneEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The study of mutations is fundamental to understanding evolution, domestication, and genetics. Characterizing mutations has the potential to accelerate breeding programs through selection and purging of deleterious mutations (DelMut). Here, we investigated how predicting DelMut in breeding populations can improve genomic prediction (GP) and inform strategies to increase the rate of genetic gain. DelMut were annotated in three independent common bean populations using a previously developed random forest (RF) model incorporating phylogenetic and protein information. Deleterious scores from the RF model were mostly around 0.25, with the top 1% ( highly DelMut) of variants scoring between 0.78 – 0.82 among populations. All populations showed variation in the number of highly DelMut per line (max. 13 – 197) and in genetic load. We assessed the impact of incorporating a priori information for variant prioritization and weighting based on predicted deleteriousness in GP models for yield and flowering time. Stochastic simulations were conducted to evaluate how different mating schemes based variable numbers of DelMut per parent affect genetic gain. Variants with higher predicted scores had significantly different effect distributions compared to random or lower-scored markers. Yield predictions were 4.47–12.3% more accurate when markers were weighted by effect and deleterious score; no consistent improvement was observed for flowering time. Simulated breeding cycles showed that selecting parents with fewer highly DelMut consistently increases the rate of genetic gain. These results highlight the potential of DelMut information for variant prioritization and the optimization of common bean breeding programs. The approaches we developed can be assessed in other species to improve the efficacy of crop improvement. Key messages - Predicted deleterious mutations have different distributions of effects based on population composition. - Variant prioritization and differential weighing of markers based on effects and deleterious scores can improve the prediction of yield. - Favoring mating schemes between parents with fewer highly deleterious mutations can increase the rate of genetic gain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207