Whole brain dimensional approach identifies networks of stress susceptibility in male and female mice.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stress is a major risk factor for depression and anxiety, two highly comorbid disorders with sex differences in symptom presentation and prevalence. Accumulating evidence on the chronic variable stress (CVS) mouse model has revealed that stress susceptibility is sex-specific, as females require less stress exposure (6 days) compared to males (21-28 days) to develop comparable adaptations in depressive- and anxiety-like behaviors. However, the neuroanatomical changes associated with stress susceptibility remain unclear in each sex. Given this differential susceptibility, elucidating these mechanisms requires a phenotype-matched approach in which stress duration is titrated in a sex-specific manner to induce comparable behavioral adaptations. Here, we used a multi-variate brain-behavior and connectomic analysis to examine signatures of stress susceptibility in female and male mice. Using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we investigate whole-brain neuroanatomical changes associated with behavioral susceptibility within each sex. We then examined the structural connectome underlying neuroanatomical changes associated with behavioral susceptibility within each sex, and putative molecular basis for behaviorally-relevant changes using spatial gene expression analyses. CVS induced significant neuroanatomical changes in regions commonly implicated in anxiety- and depressive-like phenotypes in both sexes (e.g. nucleus accumbens and hippocampus); however qualitative differences between sexes in the direction of change were observed. In addition to these changes, in females stress-induced neuroanatomical changes were associated with both depressive- and anxiety-like behavior, whereas in males we observed two orthogonal dimensions of neuroanatomical changes associated with anxiety-like behavior or social preference. The connectomic topology underlying these brain-behavior dimensions revealed the cortical hub regions for females and subcortical hub regions for males. In females, neuroanatomical changes were associated with genes enriched for protein localization to the cell surface, suggesting alterations in cholinergic signaling By implementing a phenotype-matched CVS protocol, our findings indicate that the neuroanatomical signature of stress susceptibility encompasses similar brain regions across both sexes, however the direction of change, association to behavior and connectomic properties may differ in each sex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".