MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Association Between Exposome, Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Damage and Asthma in Colombian Children Aged 2 to 4 Years

2025· article· en· W4410268740 on OpenAlexaff
Diana Marín, O. I. Morales, M. Cuellar, Augusto Corredor, Diogo Guedes Vidal, María Alejandra Bejarano, Lucelly López, Diana M. Narváez, Ana Valencia, Xavier Basagaña, Laura Andrea Rodríguez-Villamizar, Luis Jorge Hernandéz, Inmaculada Ortíz, Shrikant I. Bangdiwala, Diego A. Muñoz, Beatriz Elena Marín Ochoa, Sánchez García, Ferney Amaya-Fernández, Luis Miguel Aristizábal, Luz Yaneth Orozco-Jiménez, Francisco Molina, Celso Darío Ramos, John R. Agudelo, Roberto Hincapié, Ana Isabel Oviedo Carrascal, M. V. Toro, Ricardo Morales, José M. Abad, Helena Groot, J.J. Builes, Verónica Lopera, Zulma Vanessa Rueda

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of ManitobaMisericordia Community Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExposomeMedicineAsthmaDNAEnvironmental healthImmunologyGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract RATIONALE: Asthma is a disease that affects millions of people worldwide and is the most prevalent childhood illness. Its pathophysiology is still not fully understood, and environmental exposures along with gene-environment interactions have been identified as major contributing factors to various diseases. This study aimed to determine the contribution of early-life exposome and DNA damage to asthma, as well as the modifying effect of genetic polymorphisms. METHODS: This is an analysis from the PROMESA cohort conducted in two of the most populous Colombian cities, involving children aged 2 to 4 years. The asthma diagnosis was made by pediatric pulmonologists following a standardized protocol. Genotyping was performed to evaluate the modifying effect of genetic polymorphisms (GSTT1, GSTM1, CYP1A1, H2AX, OGG1, and SOD2) using PCR and PCR-RFLP. The early-life exposome was estimated through geographic information systems, remote sensing, LUR models, and questionnaires. The association between the exposome and asthma was estimated using Elastic Net Poisson regression with a log link and adjusted by ancestry and covariates. Interactions were identified with ExWAS. RESULTS: In 2022, 506 children (median age: 3.7 years) were studied. Asthma prevalence in 407 children was 37% (95% CI: 32.6–41.9). DNA damage was consistent regardless of asthma or acute respiratory infections presence but was higher in children with asthma in Medellín than in Bogotá (Figure 1). Exposures to dogs at home, weekly cereal intake, NO₂ during the first year, street connectivity, and recent home renovations reduced asthma prevalence by 6-29%. Conversely, curtains/carpets at home and building density within 300 m increased asthma risk by 6-54% (PR: 1.54 [1.24-1.90]). ExWAS identified 41 gene-exposome interactions (p < 0.05), with three remaining significant: home reconstructions with P53 (null vs. present), proximity to roads with GSTT1 (null vs. present), and carpets with GSTT1 (null vs. present) (see last column Table 1)CONCLUSIONS: The interaction between exposome and genetic polymorphisms is complex in children with asthma. DNA damage was greater in children in Medellín, where disease prevalence was also higher, highlighting the role of environmental factors in pediatric asthma pathophysiology. Results indicate that not only indoor exposure can influence Asthma, but also exposure at neighborhood and city level, such as urban environment and air pollution. Genetic variants in DNA repair and antioxidant defense may modulate this exposure-asthma relation. These findings can guide health professionals in assessing pediatric patients and providing environmental, dietary, and housing recommendations to prevent chronic diseases like asthma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine→Same topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research→French-language works237,207→