MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Identification of the Predictors of a Positive Eucapnic Voluntary Hyperpnea Test in Subjects Investigated for Asthma or Exercise-induced Bronchoconstriction

2025· article· en· W4410270575 on OpenAlexaff
Ioana Popescu Crainic, A.-C. Maynard-Paquette, Bruno‐Pierre Dubé

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperpneaBronchoconstrictionMedicineAsthmaPhysical therapyInternal medicineAnesthesiaRespiratory system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale Eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) is the gold standard for identifying exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in athletes, as supported by the International Olympic Committee (IOC). The relationship between the mean minute-ventilation (meanVe%MVV) during EVH and test positivity, alongside other clinical characteristics, remains unclear. This study aims to identify clinical and physiological markers predictive of a positive EVH test in a real-life setting. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of subjects who underwent EVH testing at our center from 2015 to 2024. We assessed anthropometric and demographic data, pulmonary function test results, pretest physician-assessed probability of asthma/EIB, EVH test characteristics (including meanVe%MVV), and serum levels of eosinophils and IgE as potential predictors of a positive EVH test. Results We analyzed 202 subjects, consisting of 77 males (38%), with a mean age of 35±16 years and FEV1 of 100±13% predicted, including 95 athletes (47%). Only 9 subjects (5%) had a meanVe%MVV value of < 60%. In the whole study sample, 65 subjects (32%) had a positive EVH test (EVH+ group). meanVe%MVV was 71±10% and did not significantly differ between the EVH+ and EVH-groups (70±8 vs 71±10 % of MVV, p=0.22). The area under the ROC curve for meanVe%MVV to identify a positive EVH test was 0.52 [95%CI 0.44-0.60, p=0.63). The maximal fall in FEV1 post-EVH was not correlated with meanVe%MVV (rho=-0.03, p=0.72). There were no significant differences in age, sex, serum eosinophil and IgE levels or pre-EVH lung function between the groups (all p>0.05). However, the EVH+ group exhibited significantly lower baseline FEV1/FVC ratio and FEF25-75% (both p<0.05), higher rates of active smoking (9% vs 1%, p=0.01), history of atopy (62% vs 44%, p=0.02), inhaler treatments (56% vs 37%, p=0.02), and increased physician-assessed suspicion of asthma/EIB (p=0.008). Notably, 57% of the EVH+ group reported EVH-induced symptoms compared to 23% of the EVH-group (p<0.001). Among athletes, the highest positive EVH test prevalence (44%) was found in water sports participants (p=0.03 compared to track and winter sports participants). Conclusion In our cohort, meanVe%MVV was not related to the presence of a positive EVH. However, most subjects achieved a high meanVe%MVV value, suggesting the need for further studies examining different meanVe%MVV thresholds and their impact on test positivity in individuals with known asthma/EIB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine→Same topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research→French-language works237,207→