MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Comparing the Burden of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) Among Women Across Regions: A Patient Survey

2025· article· en· W4410271158 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T. Thakur, Ioana R. Preston, Vallerie V. McLaughlin, A. Watzker, Matthew O’Hara, Abigail Silber, Matthew M. Yeh, Anjali Vaidya, Dominik Lautsch, Marion Delcroix

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary hypertensionCardiologyInternal medicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract RATIONALE: Women diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a rare and progressive disease, face an increased burden related to childbearing and childrearing across different regions. The aim of this study was to assess variations in the burden of disease in women with PAH across countries. METHODS: Women with self-reported PAH aged 21-50 years completed a 45-minute quantitative survey on the holistic impact of PAH. The survey included validated patient-reported outcome scales (WPAI, SF12, EQ5D-5L) and de novo questions derived from prior qualitative interviews. Survey responses were analyzed descriptively and stratified by country (US and UK). Exemption/approval was obtained from ethics committees for both countries, as applicable. Final analysis which includes ∼120 more patients from Canada, Germany, France, and Italy will be available for presentation at the conference. RESULTS: Interim quantitative survey data were collected from 150 respondents in the US (n=120), UK (n=30). The humanistic burden of PAH was reported to be high. Across both countries, PAH was reported to have a profound impact on quality of life (US=34%, UK = 30%, rated 6 or higher on a 7-point Likert scale where 1 is ‘absolutely no impact’ and 7 is ‘severely impacted’). Fear of worsening of PAH was higher in the US (71%) than in the UK (47%) and grief experienced by patients due to PAH was similar across both countries (US=47%, UK=43%). Forty-three-percent patients in the US and 77% patients in UK were employed part or full time. Patients reported missing 5.6 hours (mean) of work across both countries in the past 7 days due to PAH. Patients reported missing more work in the UK (mean 8.2 hours of 26 hours worked) as compared to the US (mean 4.5 hours of 27.9 hours worked). Patients reported receiving government/employer-sponsored disability benefits in both the US (58%) and UK (73%). Higher 12-month out-of-pocket costs >$1000 USD (e.g., medications, visits) were reported in patients in the UK (97%) as compared to US (50%). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study confirm that PAH exerts a substantial burden on women across both countries even though the level of impact differed between countries. The burden of PAH spanned clinical, humanistic, and economic domains, regardless of country. Moving forward, a holistic management approach is needed to address the high overall disease burden, as well as the unique challenges faced by women with PAH globally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→