MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Perceptions, Attitudes and Behaviors Among Women of Childbearing and Childrearing Age With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

2025· article· en· W4410271221 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T. Thakur, Ioana R. Preston, Vallerie V. McLaughlin, A. Watzker, Amod Athavale, Abigail Silber, Vijay Abilash, Anjali Vaidya, Dominik Lautsch, Marion Delcroix

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerceptionPulmonary hypertensionGerontologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract RATIONALE: Women of childbearing and childrearing age may face additional challenges and burden in pregnancy and motherhood when diagnosed with a progressive disease, such as pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study sought to capture the unique perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors in women with PAH related to their disease. METHODS: This is a quantitative, multi-country survey evaluating the impact of PAH on women of childbearing and childrearing age (21-50 years). Respondents completed a survey comprised of de novo questions derived from prior qualitative interviews. Perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors were summarized descriptively. Ethics approval/exemption was obtained in all included countries. Interim results are reported for the United States (US), and United Kingdom (UK). Final analysis which includes ∼120 more patients from Canada, Germany, France, and Italy will be available for presentation at the conference. RESULTS: 150 patients were included in interim analysis (US: n=120; UK: n=30). Patients were an average of 41 years old. The mean time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 2.4 years. Perceptions and attitudes: Nearly 1/4th of patients felt that certain healthcare providers had been dismissive of their symptoms due to their sex (24%) and lifestyle factors (25%; e.g. obesity). Sixteen-percent of patients reported their male physician could not relate to their situation. Overall, 63% of patients were advised not to have children following their PAH diagnosis. Feelings of extreme grief about the inability to have children naturally were reported by 17% (score of 6 or 7; 1-7 scale, 1= Received extremely inadequate/ unhelpful information), where 1= Experienced absolutely no grief; 7=Experienced extreme grief). Forty three percent of patients noted a moderate /very high financial burden of PAH on their family due to out-of-pocket expenses associated with PAH diagnosis and treatment. Behaviors: Patients reported having to self-research about the disease which involved gathering information about their disease on the internet (45%), social media (45%) and/or via patient advocacy groups (32%). 37% received information/resources from their health care provider; among them 38% (score of 7; 1-7 scale, 1= Received extremely inadequate/unhelpful information, 7= Received extremely helpful/adequate information) considered that the provided information was extremely helpful. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents novel findings on the unique perceptions and behaviors of women with PAH especially around challenging interactions with healthcare system and mechanisms to address these challenges, including the risks of childbearing. These findings underscore the need for improved disease awareness, individualized patient-healthcare provider communication and treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→