MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria in Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Under Biological Treatment

2025· article· en· W4410271278 on OpenAlexaffabout
Megan L Oswick, C. Trudel-Duchesne, E. Ben Hamou, Samuel Lemaire‐Paquette, Simon Couillard, Philippe Lachapelle

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMycobacterium research and diagnosis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEosinophilicAsthmaTuberculosisMycobacterium InfectionsMycobacteriumDermatologyImmunologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract RATIONALE: The incidence and prevalence of pulmonary infections due to non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are rising globally. NTM can be found in the sputum of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma undergoing biological treatment. This study aims to determine whether blood eosinophilia and corticosteroid use correlates with pulmonary NTM colonization or infection. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study involves patients diagnosed with severe asthma undergoing biological treatment and follow-up by respirologists in Sherbrooke University Hospital, Canada. We included patients with mycobacterial sputum cultures and collected variables from their electronic health record. The primary outcome was the association between NTM culture positivity and blood eosinophil counts, while the secondary outcome examined the impact of oral (OCS) and inhaled (ICS) corticosteroids on culture positivity. Relative risk (RR) [95% confidence intervals (CI)] were computed using univariable modified Poisson regression. RESULTS: Out of the 47 patients recruited, 22 (47%) were women and the median age was 67 years [57-72]. The median FEV1% was 70 [49-86] and the median maximum lifetime eosinophilia was 0.66 [0.40-0.90]. Lifetime maximum eosinophilia was not significantly associated with positive NTM cultures (RR = 1.27 [0.71-2.27]; p = 0.4). Among our population, 20 (44%) patients were OCS dependent. We found that every 10 mg increase of long-term OCS therapy rises the risk of a positive NTM culture by 82% (RR = 1.82 [1.14-2.91]; p = 0.01). Stated differently, every 1 mg step-up increases the risk of NTM-positive status by 6% (RR = 1.06 [1.01-1.11]; p = 0.01). Patients with current or past corticosteroid dependence seemed to double their risk of NTM positivity (RR = 2.00 [0.81-4.94]; p = 0.1) but did not reach statistical significance. Interestingly, patients with positive bacterial airway cultures were over four times more likely to develop positive NTM cultures (RR =4.50 [1.15-17.57]; p = 0.03). Additionally, 9 out of 16 (56%) patients with initially positive mycobacterial cultures subsequentially tested negative, 7 out of 9 (78%) without treatment. There was no association between high-dose ICS and NTM-positive status (RR =0.65 [0.26-1.63]; p = 0.4). NTM-positive status did not significantly correlate with increased exacerbations (RR= 1.17 [0.72-1.87]; p = 0.5). CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm a trend between OCS dependence and positive NTM sputum cultures in severe asthma on biological therapy. The high rate of concomitant positive bacterial and NTM cultures highlights the need to minimize OCS use in severe asthma and follow current corticosteroid-sparing guidelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine→Same topicMycobacterium research and diagnosis→French-language works237,207→