MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Small Airways or Big Lungs? Investigating the Structural Components of Dysanapsis and Their Associations With Obstructive Lung Physiology at Rest and During Exercise

2025· article· en· W4410274106 on OpenAlexaff
Collins, Dennis Jensen, Miranda Kirby, Dominic Phillips, Yannick Molgat‐Seon, Darcy D. Marciniuk, Brandie Walker, Shawn D. Aaron, Paul Hernandez, Wan C. Tan, J. Bourbeau, Benjamin M. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalToronto Metropolitan UniversityOttawa HospitalMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityUniversity of OttawaUniversity of SaskatchewanDalhousie UniversityUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of British ColumbiaYork UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRest (music)LungRespiratory physiologyPhysiologyIntensive care medicinePhysical therapyCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Dysanapsis refers to a developmental mismatch between airway tree caliber and lung size. Smaller airway tree caliber relative to total lung volume (TLV) assessed by computed tomography (CT) is associated with obstructive lung physiology, but whether this association is related to smaller airways, larger lungs or both, is uncertain. This study investigated the association of CT-assessed airway-to-lung ratio (ALR) and its structural components-airway tree caliber and TLV- with indices of obstructive lung physiology at rest and peak exercise. Methods: CanCOLD is a population-based cohort of adult non-smokers and smokers with or without COPD that underwent full-lung CT, spirometry, plethysmography, and symptom-limited incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing to assess peak rate of oxygen uptake (V'O2peak), with inspiratory capacity (IC) maneuvers, and ratio of exertional dyspnea (Borg 0-10)-to-minute ventilation (V'E).Mean airway tree caliber, TLV, and ALR were quantified by CT (VIDA Diagnostics). Spirometric airflow obstruction severity was quantified using forced expiratory volume in 1-second (FEV1). ERS/ATS spirometry-defined dysanapsis required a pre-bronchodilator FEV1:forced vital capacity LLN. Dynamic hyperinflation (DH) required an IC decrement from rest-to-peak exercise>0.15L. Regression models adjusted for sex, age, age2, height and height2. Results: Among 161 non-smoking non-asthmatic participants with airflow obstruction (pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.7 (mean±SD age: 69±10 years, 34% female), smaller ALR was associated with smaller airway tree caliber (p<0.001) and larger TLV (p<0.001, Table). When partitioning smaller ALR into its components, smaller airway tree caliber was associated with lower FEV1 (p=0.001), greater dyspnea:V'E (p=0.015), and more DH (p=0.016), but not lower V'O2peak (p=0.234); whereas, larger TLV was associated with higher FEV1 (p<0.001), and higher V'O2peak (p=0.002), but not DH (p=0.882) or dyspnea:V'E (p=0.079). ERS/ATS-defined spirometric dysanapsis was associated with the larger TLV (p=0.003) but not smaller airway tree caliber (p=0.264) etiotype of dysanapsis. Results tended to remain consistent when restricting to those with a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.7 (n=114) or pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine→Same topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research→French-language works237,207→