Linking international registries to FHIR and Phenopackets with RareLink: a scalable REDCap-based framework for rare disease data interoperability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
, an open-source framework implementing our previously-published ontology-based rare disease common data model, enabling standardised data exchange between REDCap, international registries, and downstream analysis tools. Its preconfigured pipelines interact with the local REDCap application programming interface and enable semi-automatic import or export of data to the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) Phenopackets and Health Level 7 (HL7) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) instances, conforming to the HL7 International Patient Summary and Genomics Reporting profiles. The framework was developed in three iterative phases using retrospective and prospective clinical data from patients with various rare metabolic and neuromuscular disorders, as well as inborn errors of immunity. Phase one involved deployment across four German university hospitals for registry and data analysis purposes. Phase two integrated RareLink with the Canadian Inborn Errors of Immunity National Registry, enhancing extensibility. Phase three focuses on international implementation in South Africa and Japan to assess global scalability. Implementation feedback was continuously incorporated to validate outputs and improve usability. For evaluation purposes, we defined a simulated Kabuki syndrome cohort based on published cases and demonstrated data export to both Phenopackets and FHIR instances. RareLink can enhance the clinical utility of REDCap by enabling structured data analysis and interoperability. Its global applicability and open-source nature can support equitable rare disease research with the ultimate goal to improve patient care. Broader adoption and coordination with entities such as HL7 and the European Reference Networks are thus essential to realise its full potential. The framework and its documentation are freely available through GitHub and Read the Docs, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".