MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Improved Expansion and Maintenance of the Differentiation Potential of Primary Human Airway Epithelial Cells

2025· article· en· W4410275735 on OpenAlexaff
Philipp Krämer, Natalie J. Ronaghan, T Brown, Viet Do, L.S. Davis, N. Potter, M. Tellis, Xinming Wang, Georgios Stroulios, Bradley S. Quon, Yidan Chen, S.A. Louis, Allen Eaves

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaStemcell Technologies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrimary (astronomy)AirwaySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract RATIONALE Primary airway basal cells and their differentiation into mature epithelia at the air-liquid interface (ALI) and as organoids are useful models for studying airway pathophysiology and drug testing. Culturing these cells in currently available media carries limitations for their growth and differentiation potential, especially when starting with low cell numbers or precious samples. Therefore, we developed PneumaCult™ Next Generation Expansion Medium (NGEx), an optimized medium for robust passaging and biobanking.METHODS Commercially available or freshly isolated healthy human bronchial (HBEC), small airway (SAEC), and nasal cells (HNEC) were expanded until 80% confluent in PneumaCult™-NGEx, PneumaCult™-Ex Plus, or other commercially available media, then serially passaged until senescence. Cells were assessed for basal cell identity and seeded into downstream assays to evaluate differentiation and function. Assays included ALI differentiation using PneumaCult™-ALI or -ALI-S Media or organoid differentiation using PneumaCult™ Airway Organoid Kit or PneumaCult™ Apical-Out Airway Organoid Medium. RESULTS Airway basal cells expanded in PneumaCult™-NGEx displayed the desired cobblestone morphology. HBECs expanded in PneumaCult™-NGEx for 20 additional population doublings (PDs) compared to PneumaCult™-Ex Plus. A high percentage (>90%) of PneumaCult™-NGEx-expanded cells expressed basal cell markers (CD49f, CD271, KRT5, or p63) throughout long-term passaging. HBECs efficiently differentiated at higher PDs (> 45 PDs) compared to other tested media (n ≥ 4 donors). After 30 PDs, PneumaCult™-Ex Plus and other media failed to differentiate in ALI cultures, whereas, HBECs expanded in PneumaCult™-NGEx successfully formed pseudostratified epithelia with beating cilia and secreted mucus, with an appropriately tight epithelial barrier (TEER ≥ 300 Ω x cm2), and responded to CFTR modulators as assessed by Ussing chambers. RNASeq analysis demonstrated that basal cells expanded in PneumaCult™-NGEx- or PneumaCult™-Ex Plus, and subsequently differentiated, had similar gene expression profiles. At later passages, PneumaCult™-NGEx-expanded cells differentiated into ciliated- and goblet cell-containing apical-in organoids with higher efficiencies and better preserved CFTR function, as assessed by the forskolin-induced swelling assay, compared to cells expanded in PneumaCult™-Ex Plus. PneumaCult™-NGEx-expanded cells successfully generated apical-out airway organoids at a higher PD than PneumaCult™-Ex Plus. SAECs and HNECs cultured in PneumaCult™-NGEx produced an additional 25 and 10 PDs, respectively, compared to cells cultured in PneumaCult™-Ex Plus. These cells generated mature ALI and organoid cultures at later passages. CONCLUSIONS PneumaCult™-NGEx outperformed all tested media in enhancing the expansion of primary airway basal cells while maintaining their differentiation potential at higher passages. Thus, it supports generating robust, functional, and physiologically relevant airway models suitable for studying airway physiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207