MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Maternal Diabetes Influences Sensitivity to Cigarette Smoke Induced Lung Inflammation and Gene Expression in Offspring

2025· article· en· W4410276396 on OpenAlexaff
S. Ranatunga, D.H.D. Mostafa, Shana Kahnamoui, Chinonye Doris Onuzulu, Harpreet Kaur, Meaghan J. Jones, Christopher D. Pascoe

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOffspringInflammationCigarette smokeDiabetes mellitusGene expressionLungGeneImmunologyInternal medicinePregnancyGeneticsEndocrinologyEnvironmental healthBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: COPD is a significant global health concern, with smoking as the primary cause. However, <20% of smokers develop COPD, suggesting there are additional factors that may modify sensitivity to cigarette smoke (CS), specifically, early-life exposures. Previously, we found that exposure to maternal diabetes (MD) modulates offspring response to acute CS, increasing airway resistance and B-cell infiltration in males. We now expand on this finding by measuring how MD alters offspring response to CS-induced changes in inflammatory mediators, and DNA methylation (DNAm) and abundance of mRNA related to lung growth/repair and CS detoxification. Methods: Six-week-old C57BL/6NJ female mice were fed with a high-fat diet (HF-45% kcal) or low-fat (control-10% kcal) control diet for 6-weeks, and throughout pregnancy and weaning. Diabetes during pregnancy was confirmed by glucose tolerance testing. Weaned offspring were fed with standard research chow-diet until 8-weeks of age, where they were exposed to CS/Room air (RA) for 50 mins, twice/day, for four days. Outcomes were measured 24 hrs after the last CS exposure. Serum Amyloid A (SAA) and Myeloperoxidase (MPO) were measured with ELISAs in the lung lavage. Lung tissues were assessed for MPO abundance, DNAm (pyrosequencing) and mRNA abundance (qPCR). Data analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Results: The abundance of mRNA involved in CS metabolism and lung growth were altered in MD offspring exposed to CS without specific changes in DNA methylation at target CpGs. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP3) abundance in male MD-RA offspring was reduced, independent of CS exposure, compared to control males (-1.4-fold decrease). A similar decrease was seen in control-CS animals (-1.5-fold decrease). CS exposure significantly increased cytochrome p450 1A1 (CYP1A1) abundance in both sexes, regardless of diet, however the magnitude of the induction was smaller in male MD offspring (6.1- vs. 3.0-fold increase in control-CS vs MD-CS exposed respectively). Female MD-CS offspring had a significant induction of epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1) abundance (1.4-fold increase). Inflammatory marker SAA was elevated in male MD-CS offspring lavage (0.27±0.01 µg/mL) compared to control-CS (0.19±0.02 µg/mL). There were no differences in MPO concentration in the lavage, but lung tissue MPO abundance was significantly higher in MD-CS offspring compared to controls, regardless of sex (345.6±16.4 vs. 308.0±12.3 pg/mg of tissue). Conclusions: Exposure to MD alters offspring susceptibility towards CS-induced lung inflammation and changes the abundance of genes involved in lung growth and CS detoxification. These changes may influence individual susceptibility to CS induced lung damage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine→Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→