MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410280138 · doi:10.12720/jait.16.5.632-647

Optimized Self-Attention Pyramidal Convolutional Neural Network for Intrusion Detection Framework in IoT

2025· article· en· W4410280138 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Padma Yenuga, Gautham Reddy, Venugopal Boppana, Sunitha Davuluri, Repudi Ramesh, Meda Srikanth, Babar Rao, Ravi Kumar Munaganuri, Narasimha Rao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advances in Information Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceIntrusion detection systemIntrusionArtificial neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research finds an important place in intrusion detection within the landscape of IoT when it puts forward the optimized Intrusion Detection System (IDS) solution.This is enabled by using the Self-Attention Pyramidal Convolutional Neural Network (SAPCNN) that is powered by Hybrid Ebola and Bald Eagle Search Optimization Algorithm, thereby enhancing classification accuracy.The methodology of this technique is basically a preprocessing tool called Dynamic Context-Sensitive Filtering (DCSF) aimed at removing data redundancy as well as filling missing values, followed by the mechanism of Pelican Optimization Algorithm (POA)-based feature selection.Performance evaluations on the Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity Intrusion Detection System 2017 Dataset (CICIDS2017) dataset reveal that the proposed IDS can accurately detect Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks with a precision of 98.9% and reduce the computational time by 31.7% as compared to baseline models.These results therefore indicate that the model can successfully handle complex Internet of Things (IoT) intrusion scenarios with great precision and efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advances in Information TechnologySame topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207