MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410280473 · doi:10.2118/224876-ms

Preventing Drill String Twist Off: Automatic Flagging of Abnormal Pressure Loss Signatures in Real-Time

2025· article· en· W4410280473 on OpenAlexaff
J. Italo Cortez, Ming Yi, Dong-Hee Yoon, Michael Behounek, Pradeepkumar Ashok, Christine East, M. Elghor, Gary Hickin, J. Pearce, Trey Peroyea, Steve White

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsApache (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlaggingDrill stringTwistComputer scienceString (physics)DrillReal-time computingEngineeringPhysicsMathematicsMechanical engineeringGeometryHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abnormal pressure loss during a drilling operation signals a failure in the fluid hydraulics circulating system. This could be due to a washout in the drill pipe (either in the body or connection), bottom hole assembly (BHA) component or connection, downhole tool failure, surface mud pump problem, or losses into the formation. This paper describes a machine learning approach to accurately flag abnormal pressure losses and identify the root cause. An operational procedure to prevent twist offs once abnormal pressure loss is flagged is also outlined. The primary method used to flag abnormal pressure loss is to compare the standpipe pressure to a statistically modeled pressure calibrated using past data from the same well. Using the standpipe pressure, statistically modeled pressure, weight on bit, RPM, and flow in, an abnormal pressure loss belief is then calculated. The belief tracks standpipe pressure trends when WOB, RPM, and flow-in signals are relatively constant. Once an abnormal pressure loss belief has been identified, further analysis is performed using contextual data, such as survey information and BHA components, to identify the root cause. This study included learning from over 100 wells on which the approach was deployed, and abnormal pressure loss was flagged. Washouts due to drill pipe and BHA connection failures and BHA failures, such as seal failures, have been shown to periodically result in abnormal pressure drops throughout a BHA run. Factors such as wellbore geometry may cause the seal/joint to open or close during the BHA run. This is reflected as drops in pressure under stable drilling parameters, such as weight on bit, RPM, and flow in, followed by a pressure increase back to normal. These periodic abnormal pressure decreases continue until the drill pipe or BHA is changed or fully twisted off. However, for drill pipe body washouts, the pressure tends to bleed off/decrease over a longer period in a more consistent manner. The ability to identify a washout in the drill pipe or BHA can be immensely helpful in preventing a twist off thereby eliminating significant non-productive time. This paper outlines a novel automatic abnormal pressure loss alert system, a process for differentiating between drill pipe body, drill pipe/BHA connection and tool failures, and an operational procedure to handle such alerts when they are flagged.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207