Integration of Digital Phenotyping and Genomics for Dry Eye Disease: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED) is a common ocular condition with diverse and heterogeneous symptoms. Current treatment standards of DED include the post facto management of associated symptoms through topical eye drops. However, there is a need for predictive, preventive, personalized, and participatory medicine. The DryEyeRhythm mobile health app enables real-time data collection on environmental, lifestyle, host, and digital factors in a patient's daily environment. Combining these data with genetic information from biobanks could enhance our understanding of individual variations and facilitate the development of personalized treatment strategies for DED. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to integrate digital data from the DryEyeRhythm smartphone app with the Tohoku Medical Megabank database to create a comprehensive database that elucidates the interplay between multifactorial factors and the onset and progression of DED. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study will include 1200 participants for the discovery stage and 1000 participants for the replication stage, all of whom have data available in the Tohoku Medical Megabank database. Participants will be recruited from the Community Support Center of Sendai, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan. Participant enrollment for the discovery stage was conducted from August 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022, and the replication stage will be conducted from August 31, 2024, to March 31, 2026. Participants will provide demographic data, medical history, lifestyle information, DED symptoms, and maximum blink interval measurements at baseline and after 30 days using the DryEyeRhythm smartphone app. Upon scanning a registration code, each participant's cohort ID from the Tohoku Medical Megabank database will be linked to their smartphone app, enabling data integration between the Tohoku Medical Megabank and DryEyeRhythm database. The primary outcome will assess the association between genetic polymorphisms and DED using a genome-wide association study. Secondary outcomes will explore associations between DED and various factors, including sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle habits, medical history, biospecimen analyses (eg, blood and urine), and physiological measurements (eg, height, weight, and eye examination results). Associations will be evaluated using logistic regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: The discovery stage of participant enrollment was conducted from August 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022. The replication stage will take place from August 31, 2024, to March 31, 2026. Data analysis is expected to be completed by September 2026, with results reported by March 2027. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the potential of smartphone apps in advancing biobank research and deepening the understanding of multifactorial DED, paving the way for personalized treatment strategies in the future. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/67862.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.030 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".