The role of antimetabolite medication compared with traditional technique (cryotherapy) for treatment of verrucae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Human papillomavirus, or HPV, is the cause of warts, which are benign skin and mucosal proliferations that typically affect the hands and feet. Due to innate immunity, warts in immune-competent individuals are benign and typically go away on their own in a matter of months or years. Fluorouracil, also known as 5-fluorouracil or 5-FU, belongs to the class of chemotherapy drugs used to treat various neoplasms. In addition, topical fluorouracil (5%) is Food and Drug Administration -approved for managing dermatologic conditions such as multiple actinic or solar keratoses and superficial basal cell carcinomas in cases where alternative methods are not feasible. Aim of the work: Compare the effectiveness of intralesional injections of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cryotherapy for the treatment of plantar warts. Patients and Methods: 60 patients with many plantar warts (more than three warts) were involved in this randomized clinical research. Patients from dermatological clinic were recruited. Results: When treating palmoplantar warts, intralesional injections of 5-fluorouracil were equally effective as cryotherapy. Conclusion: A 5-FU intralesional injection proved to be effective in treating palmoplantar warts. For palmoplantar warts, cryotherapy is also a successful treatment. Keywords: Wart; Cryotherapy; 5-fluorouracil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".