Embryogenesis in Myrmicine Ants Combines Features of Short Germ‐Band Development With a Progressive Mode of Segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ants exhibit complex social organization, morphologically and functionally distinct castes, and the exploitation of diverse ecological niches. How these features have influenced embryonic development relative to other insects remains unclear. Insect embryogenesis has been classified into three modes: In long germ-band development, exemplified by the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, segments along the entire anterior-posterior axis of the embryonic primordium are established almost simultaneously, before gastrulation, with the initial embryonic primordium surrounding almost the entire volume of the egg. In short and intermediate germ-band modes, the embryonic primordium occupies a smaller proportion of the egg surface, with anterior segments initially specified, and remaining segments being added sequentially from a posterior growth zone. Here, we examine embryogenesis in three myrmicine ants, the fungus-gardening ants Atta texana and Mycocepurus smithii, and the red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta. We find that these ant embryos combine features of short germ-band development with a newly characterized progressive pattern of segmentation that has been associated with some long germ-band-developing insects. Despite similarities in the size of ant and Drosophila eggs, embryogenesis in the three ant species is 10- to 20-fold longer than in Drosophila and is also significantly longer than in two other hymenopteran species that have been studied, the honeybee Apis mellifera and the jewel wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Moreover, the embryos produced by A. texana foundress queens develop to first instar larvae 25% faster than embryos produced by mature queens. We discuss these results in the context of the eusocial lifestyle of ants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".