MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410311878 · doi:10.18280/i2m.240207

IoT-Based Cattle Pen Monitoring and Mobile Application Interface for WS Farm: Enhancing Livestock Management Through Real-Time Data

2025· article· en· W4410311878 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mia Rosmiati, Rahmadi Wijaya, Fanni Husnul Hanifa, Rahmat Hidayat, Mulyanti Ayu Wulandari Maulana

Bibliographic record

VenueInstrumentation Mesure Métrologie · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Supply Chain Traceability
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Telkom
KeywordsLivestockInterface (matter)Internet of ThingsBusinessComputer scienceEnvironmental resource managementGeographyEnvironmental scienceWorld Wide WebOperating systemForestry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of beef cattle farming in Indonesia has significant potential, but is faced with various challenges, including monitoring optimal housing environments, limited monitoring technology, and automatic device control processes.Like WS Farm which is in Subang Regency.The condition of the WS Farm cage is an open cage, the condition of this cage is greatly influenced by the conditions of the external environment.This can affect the health of the cows in the cage.Therefore, through smart cages, cage managers can monitor the temperature, humidity and smell of the cage via a mobile device-based application.This system can monitor temperature, humidity and ammonia gas levels in the cow cage in real-time.Through the automatic fan and light control feature, the system is expected to be able to maintain the temperature of the pen according to the needs of the cows.This system was created using DHT 21 and MQ 135 sensors and Arduino as the microcontroller, while the storage process uses Firebase Realtime Database and to access the interface using an Android application.Based on the results of field testing, this system shows data measurement can be done continuously and data transmission can be done in real time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstrumentation Mesure MétrologieSame topicFood Supply Chain TraceabilityFrench-language works237,207