Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a moment marked by geopolitical warfare and territorial conflicts, the concept of space takes center stage, reshaping our perceptions of community and challenging conventional narratives. This conference presentation delves into the realm of interactive documentaries that unfold space-based narratives, presenting a rich tapestry of multi-perspective stories that encourage audiences to question singular narratives and foster empathetic connections. Drawing inspiration from Michel De Certeau's concept of "Spatial Stories" (1998), this study employs a theoretical framework that expands the audience's “sense of place” and “sense of belonging” (Nogueira, 2020) with the communities portrayed in interactive documentaries. By examining community-based storytelling and spatial navigation structures within interactive documentaries, we investigate how these narratives bring audiences closer to community territories and daily life experiences. Focusing on interactive documentaries such as "The World in Ten Blocks" (2015) and "Refugee Republic" (2014), both centered around space, this research adopts a three-fold perspective: form, content, and interaction. The analysis unravels the intricate relationships of various media formats and their intermedial form, the interactive documentaries’ content portraying closed communities, and the interactive structure that guide users through the depicted spaces. These interactive narratives serve as a conduit for diverse life experiences, embracing complexity, and celebrating diversity within the portrayed communities. Preliminary findings underscore the dynamic relationships established between the documentary creators and community members as well as between the audience and the social subjects. The study further explores the polyphonic approach, as conceptualized by Aston and Odorico (2018), emphasizing how the interactive documentaries navigate uncertain interactions, reinforcing a virtual sense of place and belonging for the audience. Ultimately, this presentation sheds light on the potential of interactive documentaries to transcend traditional storytelling, providing a platform for communities to share their stories, navigate their spaces, and foster a deeper sense of connection among diverse audiences, even if only within the virtual realm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".