ProteoPlotter: An Executable Proteomics Visualization Tool Compatible with Perseus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics experiments produce complex data sets requiring robust statistical testing and effective visualization tools to ensure meaningful conclusions are drawn. The publicly available proteomics data analysis platform, Perseus, is extensively used to perform such tasks, but opportunities to enhance visualization tools and promote accessibility of the data exist. In this study, we developed ProteoPlotter, a user-friendly, executable tool to complement Perseus for visualization of proteomics data sets. ProteoPlotter is built on the Shiny framework for R programming and enables illustration of multidimensional proteomics data. ProteoPlotter supports mapping of one-dimensional enrichment analyses, enhanced adaptability of volcano plots through incorporation of Gene Ontology terminology, visualization of 95% confidence intervals in principal component analysis plots using data ellipses, and customizable features. ProteoPlotter is designed for intuitive use by biological and computational researchers alike, providing descriptive instructions (i.e., Help Guide) for preparing and uploading Perseus output files. Herein, we demonstrate the application of ProteoPlotter toward microbial proteome remodeling under altered nutrient conditions and highlight the diversity of visualizations enabled with the platform for enhanced biological insights. Through its comprehensive data visualization capabilities, linked to the power of Perseus data handling and statistical analyses, ProteoPlotter facilitates enhanced visualization of proteomics data to drive new biological discoveries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".