Synergistic Activity of Vancomycin and Gentamicin Against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms on Polyurethane Surface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus are frequently associated with biofilm formation on intravascular devices. Biofilms limit antimicrobial penetration and promote phenotypic resistance, challenging conventional treatment strategies. Vancomycin (VAN) and gentamicin (GEN) have been used clinically, but their combined antibiofilm activity remains underexplored. This study evaluates the efficacy of VAN and GEN, alone and in combination, against biofilms formed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) on polyurethane. MICs were determined for VAN and GEN. Biofilm biomass and metabolic activity were quantified using crystal violet and MTT assays, respectively. Biofilm viability was assessed through fluorescence microscopy and a modified Calgary Biofilm Device. A continuous-flow peristaltic model was developed to test treatment under simulated catheter conditions. While monotherapy with VAN or GEN had modest effects, their combination significantly reduced biomass and metabolic activity. VAN 20 mg/L + GEN 8 mg/L and VAN 40 mg/L + GEN 8 mg/L achieved over 70% reduction in MRSA biofilm viability and complete eradication in MBEC assays. Dynamic model assays confirmed biofilm reduction with combination therapy. The combination of VAN/GEN exhibits synergistic antibiofilm activity against S. aureus, particularly MRSA. These findings support its potential application in catheter salvage strategies, including antibiotic lock therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".