Genomic Diversity of Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus in Canadian Greenhouse Production Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV) is a recently emerged viral pathogen in the Tobamovirus genus first observed in 2014 in the Middle East that has since spread worldwide, causing significant losses in greenhouse tomato production. ToBRFV is easily mechanically transmitted and can escape the durable Tm-22 resistance gene, facilitating its global spread. Seed companies have identified novel sources of resistance and introduced these resistance traits into commercial cultivars. The identity, number, and mechanisms of these putative novel resistance genes are largely unknown but could be exerting selective pressures on ToBRFV. Here, we report 15 new ToBRFV genomic sequences from Canadian greenhouse production systems in susceptible and novel resistant or tolerant cultivars collected since 2023. We combined these sequences with five other Canadian ToBRFV genomes previously deposited in Genbank and a further five consensus sequences derived from metagenomic-based wastewater monitoring sequence data and conducted phylogenetic analysis. Most Canadian sequences grouped together when compared with 332 publicly available international sequences, but several isolates appeared distantly related, suggesting multiple introductions to Canadian production systems. High sequence identity between samples suggest movement of ToBRFV between independent greenhouses, highlighting areas where biosecurity can be improved. Several novel non-synonymous polymorphisms identified in the p126 and movement protein (MP) open reading frames (ORFs) were unique to Canadian sequences and associated with infection of novel resistant tomato cultivars. Many polymorphisms in the p126 ORF are located in a region of the protein associated with Tm-1 resistance-breaking isolates of tomato mosaic virus and ToBRFV, but have not been previously reported. Four novel polymorphisms in MP were also identified and do not appear to be associated with sites previously identified as interacting with Tm-22 and could be related to other unknown resistance genes. Together, these results confirm the difficulties in preventing the transmission of ToBRFV, identify putative adaptations to novel and existing resistance genes, and emphasize the urgent need for the cloning and characterization of these new sources of resistance to ToBRFV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".