MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410333661 · doi:10.1055/s-0045-1806827

Endovascular thrombectomy for large-core stroke: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

2025· review· en· W4410333661 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marco Antonnio Rocha dos Santos, Pierludovico Moro, Abner Lucas Balduino de Souza, Lauren Nirta, Thaís Pereira Mendes, Laura de Lima Xavier, Ming-Chieh Ding

Bibliographic record

VenueArquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Randomized controlled trialConfidence intervalMeta-analysisOdds ratioComputed tomography angiographyEndovascular treatmentRadiologySurgeryInternal medicineAngiographyAneurysm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent studies have reported that endovascular thrombectomy (ET) may improve neurological outcomes in large-core stroke. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the pooled efficacy and safety of ET and of the best medical treatment among patients with large-core stroke. We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from inception to November 2023. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ET and the best medical treatment available among patients with large-core stroke (Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score [ASPECTS] < 6 or ischemic core > 50 mL on perfusion imaging) within 24 hours of symptom onset. We included 6 RTCs comprising 1,887 patients (ET group: n = 945). Endovascular thrombectomy was associated with good neurological outcomes (odds ratio [OR]: 2.92; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 2.17–3.93), or independent walking (OR: 2.22; 95%CI: 1.72–2.86). Trial sequential analysis confirmed a robust statistical significance for good neurological outcomes favoring ET. Endovascular thrombectomy was associated with higher risks of developing intracranial bleeding (OR: 2.65; 95%CI: 1.35–5.22) and symptomatic intracranial bleeding (OR: 1.83; 95%CI: 1.14–2.94). There were no differences between the groups regarding mortality or decompressive craniectomy. Patients submitted to non-contrast computed tomography (CT) with CT angiography (CTA) scans were analyzed separately and showed good neurological outcomes, comparable to those of the patients submitted to other imaging modalities (OR: 3.24; 95%CI: 1.52–6.92). Endovascular thrombectomy was associated with good neurological outcomes and independent walking in patients with large-core acute ischemic stroke. However, it was also associated with an increased risk of developing intracranial bleeding. Non-contrast head CT with CTA scans may be appropriate for screening patients to undergo ET.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0240.051
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArquivos de Neuro-PsiquiatriaSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207