MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410334394 · doi:10.3748/wjg.v31.i18.105495

Effect of electroacupuncture combined with Tuina therapy on gut microbiota in patients with knee osteoarthritis

2025· article· en· W4410334394 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiao Guo, Liang Guo, Qingling Lu, Hui Xie, Juan Chen, Wenli Su, Yuan Tian, Xiaohua Li, Yi Zhang, Yang Yan, Cai Liao, Jun-Yuan Deng, Yunhao Yang, Chenglin Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroacupunctureOsteoarthritisMedicineGut floraAcupunctureInternal medicinePathologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a chronic condition characterized by joint pain and dysfunction, driven by aging and obesity. Research indicates that the gut microbiota significantly influences KOA, potentially affecting inflammation and disease progression through the gut-joint axis. Traditional treatments like non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs offer symptom relief but have adverse effects. Emerging therapies like electroacupuncture (EA) and Tuina (TN) have shown promise in alleviating pain and improving joint function by targeting the gut microbiota. AIM To clarify the efficacy of EA with TN in treating KOA and its effect on gut microbiota regulation. METHODS Sixty patients with KOA were allocated to EA or EA + TN (ET) group (n = 30 each). Seven acupoints were punctured. The ET group received TN after each EA session. Both groups completed 12 sessions. The visual analog scale (VAS) for assessing pain and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) for measuring pain intensity, joint stiffness, and functional capacity were employed to assess clinical outcomes. Pre- and post-treatment fecal specimens underwent 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing to analyze the gut microbiota. RESULTS The ET group showed higher rates of “effective” and “markedly effective” outcomes. The VAS score of the ET group remained significantly lower than that of the EA group (P < 0.001) immediately after treatment and 1 week post-treatment. The total WOMAC score (P < 0.001), pain (P = 0.191), stiffness (P = 0.015), and function scores (P < 0.001) decreased significantly in the ET group post-treatment. The gut microbiota analysis revealed no significant changes in alpha diversity in either group. Beta-diversity analysis indicated distinct patterns in the ET group before and after treatment. Significant changes in microbial abundance were detected in both groups, highlighting variations in Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. CONCLUSION ET outperforms EA alone in improving KOA pain, stiffness, and function, potentially via gut microbiota modulation, intestinal barrier protection, and inflammation reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of GastroenterologySame topicAcupuncture Treatment Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207