MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410338584 · doi:10.1186/s40170-025-00391-5

Identification and impact of microbiota-derived metabolites in ascites of ovarian and gastrointestinal cancer

2025· article· en· W4410338584 on OpenAlex
Sisi Deng, Qianlu Yang, Yogesh Singh, Gyuntae Bae, Nicolas Bézière, Lukas F. Mager, Stefan Kommoss, Jannik Sprengel, Christoph Trautwein

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer & Metabolism · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen
KeywordsAscitesIdentification (biology)Ovarian cancerCancerMedicineInternal medicineBiologyGastroenterologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Malignant ascites is a common complication of advanced ovarian cancer (OC) and gastrointestinal cancer (GI), significantly impacting metastasis, quality of life, and survival. Increased intestinal permeability can lead to blood or lymphatic infiltration and microbial translocation from the gastrointestinal or uterine tract. This study aimed to identify microbiota-derived metabolites in ascites from OC (stages II-III and IV) and GI patients, assessing their roles in tumor progression. METHODS: Malignant ascites samples from 18 OC and GI patients were analyzed using a four-dimensional (4D) untargeted metabolomics approach combining reversed-phase (RP) and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) with trapped ion mobility spectrometry time-of-flight mass spectrometry (timsTOF-MS). Additonally, a targeted flow cytometry-based cytokine panel was used to screen for inflammatory markers. Non-endogenous, microbiota-derived metabolites were identified through the Human Microbial Metabolome Database (MiMeDB). RESULTS: OC stage IV exhibited metabolic profiles similar to GI cancers, while OC stage II-III differed significantly. Stage IV OC patients exhibited higher levels of 11 typically microbiome-derived metabolites, including 1-methylhistidine, 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid, 4-pyridoxic acid, biliverdin, butyryl-L-carnitine, hydroxypropionic acid, indole, lysophosphatidylinositol 18:1 (LPI 18:1), mevalonic acid, N-acetyl-L-phenylalanine, and nudifloramide, and lower levels of 5 metabolites, including benzyl alcohol, naringenin, o-cresol, octadecanedioic acid, and phenol, compared to stage II-III. Correlation analysis revealed positive associations between IL-10 and metabolites such as glucosamine and LPCs, while MCP-1 positively correlated with benzyl alcohol and phenol. CONCLUSION: 4D metabolomics revealed distinct metabolic signatures in OC and GI ascites, highlighting microbiota-derived metabolites involved in lipid metabolism and inflammation. Metabolites like 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid, indole, and naringenin may serve as markers of disease progression and underscore the microbiota's role in shaping malignant ascites and tumor biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it