MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410346088 · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114642

Active Surveillance for Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Canadian Children from 2021 to 2022: A Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program ACTive Study

2025· article· en· W4410346088 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Karina A. Top, Julie A. Bettinger, Joanne E. Embree, Taj Jadavji, Rupeena Purewal, Laura Sauvé, Jesse Papenburg, Shelley L. Deeks, Sarah E. Wilson, Nagib Dahdah, Manish Sadarangani, Scott A. Halperin, Fatima Kakkar, Shaun K. Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Pediatrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of WinnipegMcMaster Children's HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJaneway Children's Health and Rehabilitation CentreHospital for Sick ChildrenDalhousie UniversityCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustinePublic Health OntarioSaskatchewan Health AuthorityNova Scotia Health AuthorityCapital District Health AuthorityStollery Children's HospitalIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreSaskatchewan HealthAlberta Children's HospitalMontreal Children's HospitalUniversity of ManitobaBC Children's Hospital
FundersBC Children’s Hospital FoundationPublic Health AgencySociété Canadienne de PédiatrieMichael Smith Health Research BCBC Children's HospitalChildren's Hospital FoundationPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsMedicineMyocarditisPericarditisImmunizationActive immunizationPediatricsImmunologyInternal medicineAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To compare characteristics of children assessed at Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program Active (IMPACT) centers for myocarditis, myopericarditis, and pericarditis according to COVID-19 vaccination status, and to evaluate the association with vaccination. STUDY DESIGN: IMPACT conducted active surveillance for myocarditis, myopericarditis, and pericarditis by monitoring admission lists and diagnostic codes for children ≤16 years of age assessed in emergency departments or hospitalized with these conditions (June 2021 through December 2022). Clinical details and immunization histories were entered in an electronic database. Characteristics of cases meeting Brighton Collaboration case definitions for myocarditis and/or pericarditis were compared between COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-proximate (vaccination 0-21 days prior to presentation), remotely vaccinated (vaccinated >21 days prior), and unvaccinated cases. Relative incidence of myocarditis/myopericarditis/pericarditis 0-21 days after vaccination was estimated via a self-controlled case series analysis adjusted for pre-Omicron vs Omicron periods. Cell sizes <5 were suppressed. RESULTS: Overall, 168 cases were included: 73 (43%) vaccine-proximate cases, 47 (28%) remotely vaccinated, 39 (23%) unvaccinated, and 9 (5%) with unknown vaccination status. Among vaccine-proximate cases, 88% (64/73) were male, and 95%-99% (69-72/73) were 12-16 years of age. Among unvaccinated cases, 56% (22/39) were male, and 36% (14/39) were 12-16 years of age. Unvaccinated cases appeared more likely to require intensive care unit care (28% vs <7% of vaccine-proximate cases). The adjusted relative incidence of myocarditis/myopericarditis/pericarditis 0-21 days postvaccination was 7.1 (95% CI 4.5-11.1). CONCLUSIONS: Although myocarditis, myopericarditis, and pericarditis were associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, children with postvaccine myocarditis, myopericarditis, and pericarditis appeared to have a less severe initial course than unvaccinated children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PediatricsSame topicPericarditis and Cardiac TamponadeFrench-language works237,207