MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410351623 · doi:10.7555/jbr.39.20250043

One-year outcomes of a single bolus r-SAK before primary PCI for STEMI: Follow-up of the OPTIMA-5 study

2025· article· en· W4410351623 on OpenAlexaff
Chen Li, Jie Yu, Tian Wu, Qingxia Lin, Rui Hua, Zihang Zhong, Yule Li, Kun Liu, Li Zhu, Naiquan Yang, Xin Chen, Xiaoyan Wang, Xin Zhao, Jun Jiang, Bo Zhao, Xiwen Zhang, Peng‐Sheng Chen, Tong Wang, Yi Xu, Gaoyong Liao, Bo Chen, Zhihui Xu, Xiaoxuan Gong, Wenhao Zhang, Chunyue Tan, Lei Xu, Qiang Huang, Jianling Bai, John W. Eikelboom, Chunjian Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsHamilton General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConventional PCIMedicineBolus (digestion)Internal medicineCardiologyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The OPTIMA-5 study demonstrated that a single bolus of half-dose recombinant staphylokinase (r-SAK) before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) significantly improved the patency of infarct related artery in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) expected to undergo PCI within 120 minutes. This study aimed to investigate the 1-year clinical outcome and the effect of the r-SAK antibody on a second r-SAK thrombolysis in OPTIMA-5 patients. The clinical outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 360 days. Patients’ r-SAK antibodies were determined on days 90 &#177;7, 180 &#177;7, and 360 &#177;14 after thrombolysis, and in-vitro r-SAK antibody neutralization experiments were performed to explore an optimal interval for a second r-SAK thrombolysis. Results showed that the MACE incidence was numerically lower in r-SAK group compared with normal saline (NS) group (14.0% vs. 20.0%, HR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.34- 1.32; log-rank <i>P</i>=0.245). The r-SAK antibody levels in r-SAK group decreased by time, but kept significantly higher than those in NS group on days 90 &#177;7 (2.96 &#177;0.68 <i>vs</i>. 0.22 &#177;0.53, <i>P</i><0.001), 180 &#177;7 (2.19 &#177;0.74 <i>vs</i>. 0.44 &#177;0.65, <i>P</i><0.001) and 360 &#177;14 (1.73 &#177;0.97 <i>vs</i>. 0.37 &#177;0.71, <i>P</i><0.001). The <i>in-vitro</i> r-SAK antibody neutralization experiments illustrated that the thrombolysis rate decreased exponentially as the antibody titer increased from 1.90 to 2.20 (67.80 &#177;14.19% <i>vs</i>. 44.32 &#177;21.54%, <i>P</i><0.0001). Therefore, for STEMI patients expected to undergo PCI within 120 minutes, a single bolus of half-dose r-SAK before primary PCI may reduce 1-year MACE risk. The r-SAK antibody lasts over 1 year, and a second r-SAK thrombolysis may not be indicated until 1 year after the first r-SAK thrombolysis if necessary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.491
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical ResearchSame topicAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchFrench-language works237,207