MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410352029 · doi:10.1055/a-2609-9601

Fluorinative Difunctionalization of a Cyclooctene-Fused β-Lactam and Cyclooctene-Fused β-Amino Esters

2025· article· en· W4410352029 on OpenAlexaff
Lóránd Kiss, Melinda Nonn, Tamás T. Novák, Gábor Turczel, Gábor Hornyánszky, Pál Szabó, Santos Fustero

Bibliographic record

VenueSynthesis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicFluorine in Organic Chemistry
Canadian institutionsCentre for Drug Research and Development
FundersNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalMagyar Tudományos AkadémiaEuropean Commission
KeywordsChemistryCycloocteneBeta-lactamBETA (programming language)StereochemistryMedicinal chemistryCombinatorial chemistryOrganic chemistryAntibioticsCatalysisBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The synthesis of novel arylfluorinated cyclic β-amino acid and β-lactam derivatives is accomplished. Studies on the Pd-catalyzed arylfluorination of the double bond of a cyclooctene-fused azetidine-2-one and various β-amino esters are performed under versatile experimental conditions. The arylfluorinative difunctionalization of a cyclooctene-fused β-lactam, performed with phenylboronic acid in the presence of Selectfluor, palladium diacetate, azacyclic ligands and different solvents, gave a separable mixture of fluorinated and non-fluorinated products. In contrast, arylfluorination of cyclooctane-β-amino esters, performed under similar conditions, proceed with full regio- and stereoselective control, leading to single phenyl-fluorinated products. Possible synthetic pathways for these transformations are also proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSynthesisSame topicFluorine in Organic ChemistryFrench-language works237,207