MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sequence Diversity and Encoded Enzymatic Differences of Monocistronic L1 ORF2 mRNA Variants in the Aged Normal and Alzheimer's Disease Brain

2025· article· en· W4410358113 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Juliet Nicodemus, Christine S. Liu, Linnea Ransom, Valerie Tan, William J. Romanow, Natalia E. Jiménez, Jerold Chun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesUniversity of California, San DiegoDalhousie UniversityNational Institutes of HealthNeurocrine BiosciencesNational Institute on AgingGoizueta Business School, Emory UniversityEmory UniversityLarry L. Hillblom Foundation
KeywordsRetrotransposonBiologyMessenger RNAGeneticsHuman brainSomatic cellGeneTranscriptomeGenomeGene expressionNeuroscienceTransposable element

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reverse transcriptase (RT) activity in the human brain has been inferred through somatic retroinsertion/retrotransposition events; however, actual endogenous enzymatic activities and sources remain unclear. L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposons bicistronically express ORF2, containing RT and endonuclease (EN) domains, and RNA-binding protein ORF1, together enabling L1 retrotransposition and contributing to somatic genomic mosaicism. Here, we assessed endogenous RT activities and L1 mRNA diversity from cerebral cortex samples of 31 Alzheimer's disease (AD) and nondiseased (ND) brains (both sexes) using enzymatic functional assays, targeted PacBio HiFi long-read sequencing, and quantitative spatial transcriptomics. Expected bicistronic, full-length L1 transcripts were absent from most samples, constituting <0.01% of L1 sequences, of which >80% were noncoding. Monocistronic ORF1 and ORF2 transcripts were identified across all samples, consistent with quantitative spatial transcriptomics that identified discordant ORF2 and ORF1 expression in neurons. All brains had RT activity, with AD samples showing less activity, consistent with neuronal loss of terminal AD versus aged ND donors. Brain RT activity was higher in the gray matter and correlated with increased neuronal ORF2 expression, further supporting neuronal contributions. Remarkably, >550 protein-encoding, poly(A + ) ORF2 sequence variants were identified, over two times more than identified in the human reference genome (hg38). Experimental overexpression of full-length and truncated ORF2 variants revealed ∼50-fold RT and ∼1.3-fold EN activity ranges, supporting endogenous functional capacity of monocistronic ORF2 variants in the human brain. The vast sequence diversity of monocistronic ORF2 mRNAs could underlie functional differences in RT-mediated somatic gene recombination/retroinsertion and resulting genomic mosaicism in the normal and diseased brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207