Influenza A virus interferes with respiratory syncytial virus in mice and reconstituted human airway epithelium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Epidemiological studies suggest that respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza A virus (IAV) might interfere with each other. Viral interference mainly relies on interferon production elicited by a first virus that reduces the replication of a second virus. In this paper, we first investigated the interactions between RSV-A2 and influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in BALB/c mice infected with each single virus or both viruses simultaneously or sequentially before, at the peak of interferon elicited by each virus, or after that peak. IAV reduced by almost 3.0 logs the replication of RSV administered at the peak of interferon induced by influenza, but the opposite was not true. However, IAV-infected mice challenged with RSV or the vehicle lost more weight and had a lower survival rate compared to single infections. Interferon expression, cytokine levels, and pulmonary inflammation were almost similar between groups. Disease worsening was attributed to an aggravation of IAV-induced pulmonary congestion following intranasal instillation of fluid (with or without RSV). In human airway epithelia, IAV also interfered with RSV replication. Viral interference was dependent on the timing and sequence of infections but not on differential interferon susceptibilities. Overall, our results help to understand the mechanisms of the interaction between two major respiratory viruses.IMPORTANCERespiratory syncytial and influenza viruses may interfere with each other based on epidemiological studies. It is suggested that a first virus may induce the production of interferon and interfere with the replication of a second unrelated virus. Our data showed that the influenza A virus interferes with respiratory syncytial virus replication in mouse lungs, but the opposite was not observed. In reconstituted human airway epithelia, viral interference was dependent on the timing and sequence of infections but not on differential interferon susceptibilities. Understanding the mechanisms of interaction between respiratory viruses may help the development of prophylactic or therapeutic modalities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".