Early evolvability in arthropod tagmosis exemplified by a new radiodont from the Burgess Shale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Much diversity in arthropod form is the result of variation in the number and differentiation of segments (tagmosis). Fossil evidence to date has suggested that the earliest-diverging arthropods, the radiodonts, exhibited comparatively limited variability in tagmosis. We present a new radiodont, Mosura fentoni n. gen. and n. sp., from the Cambrian (Wuliuan) Burgess Shale that departs from this pattern. Mosura exhibits up to 26 trunk segments, the highest number reported for any radiodont, despite being among the smallest known. The head is short, with a small, rounded preocular sclerite, three prominent eyes and appendages with curving endites tipped with paired spines, altogether suggesting a nektonic, macrophagous predatory ecology. The trunk is divided into a neck, mesotrunk with large swimming flaps and multisegmented posterotrunk with tightly spaced bands of gill lamellae and reduced flaps. Detailed preservation of expansive circulatory lacunae, closely associated with the gills, clarifies the nature of similar structures in other Cambrian arthropod fossils, including Opabinia . The morphology of the posterotrunk suggests specialization for respiration, unique among radiodonts, but broadly convergent with the xiphosuran opisthosoma, isopod pleon and hexapod abdomen. This reinforces the hypothesis that multiple arthropod lineages underwent parallel diversification in tagmosis, in tandem with their initial Cambrian radiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".