MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410381979 · doi:10.1186/s12870-025-06666-9

Comparative metabolomics of two nettle species unveils distinct high-altitude adaptation mechanisms on the Tibetan Plateau

2025· article· en· W4410381979 on OpenAlexafffund
Lijuan Deng, Yin-Lei Li, Fengying Wang, Richard I. Milne, Jie Liu, Zeng‐Yuan Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Plant Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedicinal plant effects and applications
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough Hospital
FundersNational Ten Thousand Talent ProgramRecruitment Program of Global ExpertsChina Scholarship CouncilUniversity of TorontoNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBiologyMetabolic pathwayBotanyMetabolomicsPhenylpropanoidMetabolismBiochemistryBiosynthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The extreme high-altitude conditions of the Tibetan Plateau, characterized by intense solar radiation, low temperatures, and reduced oxygen levels, poses significant challenges to plant survival. Plants inhabiting this region have evolved specialized mechanisms to adapt to high-altitude environments. While most studies have focused on genomic and ecological perspectives, few have explored adaptive mechanisms in a metabolic context. In particular, comparative studies examining similarities and differences in the metabolomes of closely related species are exceedingly rare. As sister species, the nettle species Urtica hyperborea and U. dioica are distributed above 4000 m above sea level, with a sympatric distribution on the Tibetan Plateau, they provide an ideal system to investigate the aforementioned question. RESULTS: In this study, we conducted non-targeted metabolic profiling of the leaves from U. hyperborea and U. dioica collected at three sympatric sites on the Tibetan Plateau. A total of 2906 annotated metabolites were detected. Differential metabolites at Sites 1 (4697 m) and 3 (4465 m) were enriched in pathways for flavonoid, flavone and flavonol, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. In contrast, Site 2, located at the highest altitude (5007 m), primarily exhibited enrichment in carbon metabolism pathways. Regarding the altitudinal variation of the same species, common metabolic pathways between the two groups included fructose and mannose metabolism, α-linolenic acid metabolism, and glycerophospholipid metabolism. The metabolic pathways enriched only inU. hyperboreaincluded starch and sucrose metabolism, galactose metabolism, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. The metabolically enriched pathways specific toU. dioicaincluded pantothenate and coenzyme A biosynthesis, as well as glutathione metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the metabolic differences between the two sympatric species are primarily in carbohydrate and phenylpropanoid contents. The differential metabolites of the same species across different altitudes were enriched mainly in carbon metabolism pathways and lipid metabolism pathways. Thus, our study revealed that the high-altitude adaptation mechanisms of sympatric species are not identical. Moreover, adaptation strategies within the same species were generally consistent across altitudes, exhibiting only slight variations. This study provide novel insights into the adaptive metabolic strategies of U. hyperborea and U. dioica, contributing to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying plant adaptation to extreme high-altitude conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Plant BiologySame topicMedicinal plant effects and applicationsFrench-language works237,207