Mass modelling the Andromeda Dwarf Galaxies: Andromeda VI and Andromeda XXIII
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Accurately mapping the mass profiles of low mass dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxies allows us to test predictions made by dark matter (DM) models. To date, such analyses have primarily been performed on Milky Way (MW) satellites. Meanwhile, the Andromeda galaxy (M31) is home to 35 known dwarf galaxies, yet only two have been successfully mass-modelled so far. A more comprehensive study of Local Group dwarfs is necessary to better understand the nature of dark matter. In this study, we have undertaken a dynamical study of two higher-luminosity Andromeda dwarf galaxies: Andromeda VI (And VI) and Andromeda XXIII (And XXIII). We infer an enclosed mass for And VI of M(r $<$ r$_{h}$) = (4.9 $\pm$ 1.5) $\times$ 10$^{7}$ M$_{\odot }$, corresponding to a mass-to-light ratio of $[M/L]_{r_{\rm {h}}}$ = (27.1 $\pm$ 8.2) M$_{\odot }$ L$_{\odot }$−1. We infer an enclosed mass for And XXIII of M(r $<$ r$_{h}$) = (3.1 $\pm$ 1.9) $\times$ 10$^{7}$ M$_{\odot }$, corresponding to a mass-to-light ratio of $[M/L]_{r_{\rm {h}}}$ = (90.2 $\pm$ 53.9) M$_{\odot }$ L$_{\odot }$−1. Using the dynamical Jeans modelling tool, gravsphere, we determine And VI and And XXIII’s dark matter density at 150 pc, finding $\rho _{\rm {DM,VI}}$ (150 pc) = (1.4 $\pm$ 0.5) $\times 10^{8}$ M$_{\odot }$ kpc$^{-3}$ and $\rho _{\rm {DM,XXIII}}$ (150 pc) = 0.5$\substack{+0.4 \\ -0.3} \times 10^{8}$ M$_{\odot }$ kpc$^{-3}$. Our results make And VI the first mass-modelled M31 satellite to fall into the cuspy regime. And XXIII has a lower density, implying either a more cored central dark matter density, or a lowering of the density through tides, with early quenching times disfavoring core formation via stellar feedback. This adds And XXIII to a growing list of M31 dwarfs with a central density lower than most MW dwarfs and lower than expected for isolated dwarfs in the Standard Cosmology. This could be explained by the M31 dwarfs having experienced stronger tides than their MW counterparts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".