MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410398330 · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15101264

The Association of Placental Grading with Perinatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2025· review· en· W4410398330 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Antonios Siargkas, Christina Pachi, Meletios P. Nigdelis, Sofoklis Stavros, Ekaterini Domali, Apostolos Mamopoulos, Ιoannis Tsakiridis, Themistoklis Dagklis

Bibliographic record

VenueDiagnostics · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisGrading (engineering)MedicineAssociation (psychology)ObstetricsSystematic reviewPsychologyMEDLINEInternal medicineBiologyPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Premature placental calcification (PPC) has been implicated in adverse perinatal outcomes, yet its clinical significance remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to quantitatively synthesize current data on the association between PPC, defined as grade 3 placental calcification before 36+6 weeks of gestation and adverse perinatal outcomes. Data Sources: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus and The Cochrane Library from inception until 11 March 2025, to identify eligible studies. Study Eligibility Criteria: Observational studies including singleton pregnancies with PPC diagnosed via ultrasonography between 28+0 and 36+6 weeks of gestation and comparing them with pregnancies with Grannum grade 0, 1, or 2 placentas were considered eligible. Methods: Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle−Ottawa Scale, and the risk of bias was evaluated with the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. The primary outcomes were small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates and preeclampsia. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q test and the I2 statistic. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model, with outcomes reported as relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: In total, nine cohort studies were included. PPC was associated with an increased risk of SGA (RR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.46−2.70), preeclampsia (RR, 5.27; 95% CI, 2.24−12.40), fetal growth restriction (RR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.30−4.09), preterm delivery (RR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.00−4.45), suspected fetal hypoxia (RR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.13–2.56), low 5 min Apgar score (RR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.50−3.44) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.02−3.18). No significant associations were found with fetal or neonatal death (RR, 2.75; 95% CI, 0.87−8.71), cesarean delivery (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.90−1.78), gestational diabetes mellitus (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.81−1.70), neonatal resuscitation (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92−1.16), birthweight (MD, −187.46 g; 95% CI, −413.14 to +38.21), or gestational age at birth (MD, −0.62 weeks; 95% CI, −1.36 to +0.11). A sensitivity analysis excluding high-risk-of-bias studies yielded consistent results. Conclusions: PPC is associated with several adverse perinatal outcomes, including SGA and preeclampsia. While the clinical significance of placental grading has remained limited in recent years, this study has shown that PPC may serve as an early indicator of placental insufficiency, warranting enhanced fetal surveillance and risk assessment in affected pregnancies. Further research is needed to refine its prognostic utility and integration into obstetric practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiagnosticsSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207