Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Referred for Liver Transplantation After Nucleos(t)ide Analog Cessation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) provide prolonged viral suppression with favourable clinical outcomes in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Characterisation of adverse hepatic events after NA cessation leading to liver transplantation (LT) is vital to the improvement of patient management and safety considerations. This is a retrospective case series of CHB patients who developed hepatic decompensation due to NA discontinuation and were referred for LT. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or coinfection were excluded. Of 11 CHB patients included (81.8% clinical jaundice, 63.6% ascites, 54.5% hepatic encephalopathy and 18.2% variceal bleeding), 45.5% underwent LT, 36.4% were waitlisted (1 active, 1 died, 2 delisted of whom 1 died), and 18.2% died after referral during the assessment period. Median age was 55.1 years, 81.8% were male, and 72.7% had cirrhosis at NA cessation. Reasons for NA withdrawal included nonadherence (81.8%) and physician discretion (18.2%). Median time from NA cessation to a decompensating event was 3.2 months, and from the decompensating event to referral was 16.0 days. This study shows that most patients experience decompensations soon after NA cessation and reinforces that patients should not discontinue treatment themselves. Physicians should very carefully select non-cirrhotic, adherent patients for NA withdrawal, after which close monitoring and timely retreatment are crucial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".